A 19 year old Swedish woman has been convicted in court after warning about a man who had been convicted of committing sexual offense against a 13 year old girl.

It was true that the man was convicted. What the woman said was true. Yet this woman has now been convicted of ”gross defamation” for speaking out. And the reasoning from the court will shock you.

This 19 year old woman was a friend of the 13 year old girl and had testified against the man in court. She had even helped the girl get away from the man.

However, she encountered the man again in 2025 during a leisure activity in which this man and others were involved in.

There was a private group chat with around 20 members linked to this leisure activity. So she decided to warn the others in the group chat about this man.

The man was also in the same group chat and he reported her for defamation.

And this is what she was convicted for. She warned about a convicted sex offender that had attacked a 13 year old girl.

It didn’t matter that it was true that the man was convicted. The court decided to convict the woman of ”of gross defamation” anyway.

Now she must pay around $3100 in compensation to the convicted man.

So essentially what happened here was this. A man committed sexual crimes against a 13 year old girl, and now he is earning money because others have warned about him. This just should not be able to happen. It is a scandal.

Here is the reasoning from the court for convicting the woman.

”It is noted that the message and its information were based on an event that took place approximately three years ago. The public interest in disclosing the information cannot therefore be considered to have been of significant weight, and the District Court assesses that it was not justifiable...to disclose the information. The fact that it was true is then of no relevance to the assessment.” the court writes in the verdict.

So the court admits that what she said was true. But the court claims that there wasn’t any public interest for the woman to warn others about what he had done because the conviction took place 3 years ago. Therefore the court claims it was not ”justifiable” for her to do warn others.

Absolutely unbelievable. How does the court even come up with something like this?

But there is more. The woman was 17 years old when she warned the others in the group chat, had she been 18 years old, she would have risked being sent up to 2 years in prison instead.

Imagine that. In Sweden, people can be sent to 2 years in prison for warning others about a man that was convicted of sexual crimes against a 13 year old child.

This news comes shortly after a man in his 40s was set free by the court after raping a 14 year old girl in a Stockholm park.

In that case, part of the reasoning from the court in setting the man free, was because the court claimed that the 14 year old girl could ”simply leave”. So the court victim blamed the girl and claimed she could have stopped the attack herself.

Absolutely unbelievable.

So we have now had two court cases recently that is completely shocking. These kind of rulings just should not be able to happen.

Yet it has happened in Sweden.

A woman was convicted and sentenced for warning about a man that was convicted of sexual crimes against a 13 year old.

Meanwhile a man in his 40s who raped a 14 year old girl was set free by the court because the court claimed she could ”simply leave” during the attack.

I’m lost for words.

This is not the Sweden that I remember.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

What I’m about to tell you has barely been covered in the international news.

The things happening in Sweden now is beyond belief. I’m simply lost for words at this court ruling.

A man in his 40s was just set FREE by the court after raping a 14 year old girl in a park.

You read that correctly. It is shocking. And the reasoning in the verdict from the court is also shocking.

Let me give you all the details.

The man who is from Romania raped the 14 year old girl in a park in Stockholm. The girl is diagnosed with both autism and ADHD.

The girl said that the attack felt ”like an eternity”.

After what happened to her, she immediately called the police crying for help. It is being reported that the girl now has difficulties sleeping after what happened to her.

The man was prosecuted in Stockholm District Court, with the prosecutor asking for 3 years prison ande deportation from Sweden for life.

But what did the court rule?

Not only did the court not deport the man, but he didn’t even get any prison. He was set free.

And here comes some shocking details from the court verdict.

”The course of events appears, in the opinion of the district court, to be such that the plaintiff had several opportunities to simply leave and/or interrupt what was happening”.

Read that again.

Part of the reasoning that the court set this man free was because they claimed the 14 year old girl could ”simply leave” when she was being raped by the man in his 40s.

So the court essentially said that this young girl could have stopped the attack herself and therefore they set the an free.

Again, I’m lost for words. This is victim blaming.

One more important thing. The girl is a child. A child cannot consent. Yet the court set the man free. This just should not be possible. This kind of verdict should not be able to happen.

Now, I need to explain a little how the Swedish court works. In this case it was a lay judge verdict.

In Sweden there is a lay judge system. So in this case, there was 1 professional judge and 3 lay judges. Lay judges are people that are nominated by political parties. This is supposed to bring public representation into the court room.

But what happened here was that the 3 lay judges decided to set the man free. And guess what? One of the lay judges is affiliated with the centre-right Moderate party that is currently in government.

The professional judge however issued a dissenting opinion and wanted the man convicted and sentence to 3 years in prison and deportation from Sweden for life.

”In my opinion, the plaintiff’s account is supported by the emergency call and the incident report...one can also hear that the plaintiff is crying” the professional judge wrote.

So the professional judge wanted to convict the man, but the 3 politically appointed lay judges decided to set the man free.

The prosecutor is not happy with the verdict and is appealing to the Svea Court of Appeal.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

Here is something that you don’t hear much about in the news.

But right now something seems to be happening in Europe.

There has been an increasing public support for closing the borders and even deportations, something that has gained traction under the new term ”remigration”.

People have long been called ”far-right” for voicing such ideas. However, now polls show that in many European countries, there is now actually a large majority of the population that supports the idea of remigration.

Not only that, but it is now being pushed by major political parties such as the Austrian Freedom Party, which is by far the largest party in the latest polls.

I decided to take a look at the data and present it to you here.

Not long ago, I wrote about the new poll from Norway that found that there is now RECORD LOW support for more immigration into the country. Only 17% of Norwegians believe that Norway should take in more immigrants.

But not only that, the poll also found that 49% of people support voluntary returns and 35% of people support forced returns.

In total, 84% of people in Norway support remigration in some form if the situation in the home country is safe.

There was also a recent poll by Euromedia Research from Italy where they asked people their thoughts on this topic.

And it was found that 73% of Italians want to deport people who are in the country illegally.

Another recent poll from France conducted by the CSA Institute found similar numbers.

Here, they found that 83% of people in France support the idea of deporting people who have committed crime or are long term unemployed.

The most interesting thing in this poll perhaps, is that the strongest support for this was found among young people.

Among those 18 to 24 year old, a whopping 90% of people were in favor.

And this was not limited to left versus right. Support for deportation was high even among left-wing voters.

For those who support the Socialists, 75% of people were in favor of deportation.

Just recently, the EU Parliament votes to approve the new Return Regulation which gives member states the power to setup deportation centers, known as ”Return Hubs” in countries outside the EU.

So it seems like things are changing in Europe.

The idea of ”remigration” is becoming mainstream and something that many people now seemingly support.

And it is not a right or left issue. There is broad support across the political spectrum for this.

This is in stark contrast to the open borders we saw in Europe some ten years ago.

There is nothing extreme about wanting to protect your borders.

However, it is extreme to have completely open borders.

I’m bringing you the news that you don’t hear about in the mainstream media.

Support my independent journalism by upgrading to a paid subscriber today AND get access to exclusive articles!

Subscribe now

They have done it again.

The European Union have just come with more bureaucracy. It wasn’t enough with the plastic bottle caps.

Now a new law has come into effect on the 7th of July which requires all new cars in the EU to MONITOR the driver using cameras or similar sensors.

All cars must come installed with something called Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW for short).

So how exactly does this system work?

Well, all cars will come with a camera installed that constantly monitors the driver. Equivalent sensors are also allowed under this system, but it seems like cameras will be the standard.

These cameras will continuously be monitoring the eyes, face, head position and where the driver is looking.

It is designed to detect things like distraction or fatigue. This is being promoted as something that will be positive for safety.

And if the cameras deem that the driver looks away from the road for too long, for example if they spend too much time adjusting the temperature in the car.

This will then trigger warnings in the car, with lights on the dashboard and warning sounds. The cars must also give haptic feedback, such as vibrations in the steering wheel or in the seat itself.

Now, I know that many people will be concerned about having a camera inside the car that is constantly monitoring the driver.

But the cameras are not allowed to record videos, use facial recognition or send any data outside the car.

That is what is being said.

Sure, but how do we know it will stay this way?

Maybe the next step will be that facial recognition is added to the cameras. It will be very easy to implement once the hardware is in all the cars. Just a quick software update and suddenly the car can have facial recognition.

Perhaps it could be used in the future to ban anyone that the state dislikes from driving?

Perhaps a person had exceeded their carbon quota and now they are suddenly banned from driving for a month?

You never know what can happen in the future.

The more possibilities for surveillance, the easier it would be for a totalitarian system to take complete control.

Do you support freedom?

I do. The name of this publication is literally The Freedom Corner with PeterSweden.

Support my freedom publication by upgrading to a paid subscription today if you don’t have one already.

By doing so, you will be supporting my independent journalism and will allow me to do even more work to reach more people with news on freedom related topics and more.

And you get access to exclusive articles as well.

It’s a win win!

I try to keep as many of my articles as possible without a paywall, as I want as many people as possible reading about these important stories.

However, I can only do so if enough of my readers do support me with a paid subscription.

Your paid subscription is what allows me to write articles like this without a paywall!

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

The British government has announced a new draft bill called the ”Conversion Practices Bill”.

Of course, the government say that this bill is designed to protect people from ”abuse”.

But, I took a deeper look into the wording in this bill and it is quite frankly shocking.

The court can even issue a ”protection order” against a parent on a PREVENTATIVE BASIS if they think the parent is ”likely” to do something that violates this new bill. Read my article to the end to get the details on what this means.

Is this what is called pre crime?

Under this new bill, there is a serious concern that parents could be imprisoned (and more) if they for example tell their child that they are either male or female and certain criteria are met, which I will show you what they are.

Parents are risking up to 5 years in prison plus an UNLIMITED FINE if they are found to not follow this new law.

Because this new bill is broad, you just know that woke activists will use the new laws to persecute parents that refuse to follow the woke agenda.

In other words, parents that have traditional views on gender, that there is only male and female, and apply this to how they parent their children, will most certainly face risks under this new bill.

So, the bill aims to stop what they call abusive conversion practices.

What do they mean by this?

”conversion practice” means...any conduct carried out by a person towards an individual with the intention of

(a) causing the individual

(i) to have or not to have,

(ii) to believe that they have or do not have, a sexual orientation or a particular sexual orientation; or

(b) causing the individual

(i) to have or not to have,

(ii) to believe that they have or do not have, a transgender identity or a particular transgender identity.

And in another section of the bill they define transgender as also meaning that ”the individual identifies as neither male nor female or as not solely male or female”.

So the definition of transgender identity is broad and includes people who identify as non binary identities also. So, someone who identifies as ”genderfluid”, ”agender”, ”genderless” or ”bigender” would be covered by this new bill.

Keep that in mind as I go into more detail of what this bill says and how parents could be punished.

This new bill does not give exemptions to parents or family, meaning that anyone who is found in violation of this new law risk 5 years prison plus an unlimited fine. This includes parents, religious leaders and anyone else except medical professionals.

What kind of ”conduct” could cause a parent to be thrown in prison?

Let me tell you what the bill says. Let me give you a scenario.

• First: If a parent has shows conduct with the intention of either changing or preventing a belief in a particular gender identity, that qualifies as ”conversion practice” under the bill.

• Second: If a parent tells a child that they are either male or female or opposes the idea of ”genderfluid” for example and the parent use what the bill calls ”coercive words or behaviour”, then it would qualify as ”abusive conversion practice”.

• Third: If the parent has done what the bill calls ”abusive conversion practice” and it causes ”serious alarm or distress to the individual which has a substantial adverse effect on their usual day to day activities” it now crosses over into a CRIMINAL OFFENCE.

• Fourth: The parent can then be convicted in court and sentenced up to 5 years in prison plus an UNLIMITED FINE.

But it doesn’t stop there.

If anyone is found ”encouraging” a parent in ANOTHER country to tell their child that they are either male or female and it meets the criteria that I just listed above, they can also be thrown in prison for up to 5 years and unlimited fine.

For example, if someone posts it on social media, that could be enough to throw someone in prison.

But it doesn’t even stop there!

Authorities can also report or cause a ”Conversion Practice Protection Order” (CPPO) to be made against the parents if the court believes that the parents are ”likely to cause” ”serious alarm or distress to the individual which has a substantial adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal day to day activities”.

This can be done on a preventative risk basis without even what the bill calls a ”criminal offence” having been commited.

And what can this CPPO do?

Here is where things get even more Orwellian. Not only can the order be issued against a parent on a PREVENTATIVE BASIS, but the things the order can do is also very broad.

”A conversion practice protection order may contain

(a) such prohibitions, restrictions or requirements, and

(b) such other terms,

as the court considers appropriate for the purposes of the order.”

In other words, the court has a very broad discretion of what they can impose.

So for example, the court could order the parent to stop using certain words such as forcing the parent to stop telling their own child that they are either male or female.

The court could restrict or supervise contact. The court could also for example ban the parent from involving their child in religious activities that are deemed ”abusive”.

The court could possibly also order the parent to attend counselling. The list is pretty big because the court has very broad discretion.

And what happens if the parent doesn’t follow the CPPO? They can be thrown in prison for 2 years.

This is it.

Parents would risk being persecuted and thrown in prison by woke activists and authorities just because they want to raise their own children in a traditional way and they don’t agree with gender ideology.

It is clear that they think the children belong to the state rather than the parents.

And all this comes just shortly after Britain has RESTARTED trials where they will begin giving puberty blockers to children as young as 11.

I will say it loud and clear.

This goes against all human rights.

This is Orwellian.

Have you heard anything about this unbelievable story on the news?

I’m an independent journalist which is why I can bring you this story without any censorship.

But I need your help.

Please consider supporting my work with a paid subscription which will help to continue bringing you news stories like this – And I will be able to reach even more people.

Thank you for your support!

Subscribe now

Share

Just recently I reported on how the EU Parliament voted YES on the new Return Regulation.

This will enable countries to setup deportation centers, also called Return Hubs, in third countries located outside the EU.

And plans have already begun.

A group of EU countries have come together to coordinate efforts to create these return hubs with the goal of having them operational already by next year.

Denmark, Austria, Greece, Germany and the Netherlands are behind this push.

It is being mentioned that Rwanda and Uzbekistan are countries being considered where these return hubs will be built.

The government in Greece has previously said that return hubs like this will act as a deterrent to stop people from coming to Europe.

So the idea is that people arriving in Europe know there will be a chance they can be sent to a return hub far away from European borders. This in turn will act as a deterrent to stop people from coming in the first place.

And now this group of EU countries are in advanced stages of negotiations, already holding talks with host countries to build the return hubs there.

These return hubs will function essentially as deportation centers, places where people who have deportation order can be sent.

So if it is not possible to send them back to their home countries, they can be sent to these return hubs instead.

It appears that things are moving ahead quickly now.

Things are changing in Europe.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

Today I have some updates for you from Spain that you might have missed.

A Socialist politician and the former Transport Minister of Spain was just sentenced to prison for corruption regarding covid face mask contracts.

What a surprise, there was corruption involved during the pandemic?

Not only was he the Transport Minister of Spain, but also a longtime ally of the Spanish Socialist Prime Minister, even serving as the organization secretary within the Socialist party.

So what exactly happened?

In March 2020 just as the pandemic hysteria was beginning to intensify, emergency contracts was awarded by the Ministry of Transport to a company called Soluciones de Gestión y Apoyo a Empresas. This company had no previous experience in supplying PPE.

Around 13 million masks in total were ordered with contract values of around €36.7 million.

These were ordered in to Adif, a state owned company that manages the railway infrastructure in Spain and for Puertos del Estado which manages the main commercial ports in Spain.

The former Transport Minister got kickbacks and other illicit benefits for using his position to award government contracts for face masks to this particular company.

He got €10.000 per month in cash payments to cover ”fixed expenses”.

He also got €2 million in commision from the government deals.

He also got additional benefits such as a deal on real estate in Madrid and he even got rent for an apartment paid for his partner.

The case also involved two women, one of whom was the partner of the Transport Minister, being given jobs for public state owned companies overseen by the Transport Minister as part of the scheme.

In other words, they got the job not based on merit, but because of corruption.

So essentially the Socialist Transport Minister of Spain awarded government contracts worth tens of millions to a company who paid him kickbacks and massive personal benefits.

And now he has officially been sentenced to 24 years and 3 months in prison.

However, it is being reported that he won’t actually serve more than around 16.5 years behind bars because of the laws in Spain.

Bribery and corruption from a Socialist? What a surprise.

And it happened from the government during covid? What a surprise.

Did politicians enrich themselves during the covid pandemic?

The answer is certainly yes in this case.

Become a supporter of my independent journalism.

In a world where the mainstream media continues to censor important issues, it is more important than ever that independent journalists like me are here to expose the agenda.

I need your help to do it!

Subscribe now

Very major news coming from Europe.

The European Parliament just voted YES and has now approved the new Return Regulation.

This is very big, and the left has been very upset that this law passed. But major political figures like Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni has supported this new regulation.

Some unusual scenes was seen in the EU parliament as the news was announced, with right-wing politicians shouting ”SEND THEM BACK” inside the parliament building.

The vote passed with 418 votes in favor of the new law and 218 voting against it.

Centre-right parties in the EU parliament came together with the right-wing parties to approve this new regulation.

So what does this mean?

This new rules establishes a Common European System for Returns with the goal of simplifying, speeding up and making returns (deportations) more effective in the EU.

Subscribe now

People who don’t cooperate, are at risk of fleeing or people who pose a security risk can be detained to ensure effective deportation of the person.

Authorities will also be able to enter the place of residence to find migrants who have failed to comply with a return order and also seize their documents and phones.

Not only that, but searches of ”other relevant premises” will also be allowed, meaning that EU citizens who are suspected of sheltering migrants with a return order can also potentially have their homes raided by authorities.

Even NGO organisations suspected of sheltering migrants with a return order can be raided.

Such raid will however require prior authorization and must be linked to enforcing specific return orders.

Return hubs.

EU member countries can now arrange agreements with third countries outside the EU to setup return hubs, places where people issued with deportation can be transferred.

This is significant.

It means there will be facilities located outside the EU where people can be deported. Essentially, they will be deportation/processing centers.

These return hubs can only be setup in countries that respect human rights and international law. In other words, it must be safe.

Of course, this will likely be a deterrent from people wanting to migrate to the EU in the first place if they know there is a risk they will be deported to a deportation centers outside the EU.

Greece already has plans to have return hubs operational by 2027. They are already in talks with several countries in Africa which could be either used as transit points or longer term facilities.

Leftist politicians are very upset at these return hubs, comparing them and the possible home raids to ”Trump era” and ”ICE style” practices.

A standardized European Return Order will also be introduced, with return decisions being shared across the Schengen area, with member states being able to recognize and enforce return decisions issued by another member state.

This won’t be mandatory at first, but may become mandatory later on.

So, big changes are happening in the EU.

One could say that this is the beginning of remigration.

Do you find my news reporting helpful and informative?

I’m an independent journalist and I rely on your support.

If you aren’t one already, please consider supporting my work with a paid subscription.

With your support, I can reach even more people with news that is being censored by the media.

Plus, with a paid subscription you will also get access to read exclusive articles.

Thank you, I couldn’t do this without your help!

Subscribe now

Something has happened.

The ”Integreringsbarometeret 2026” just dropped. This is translated as the ”integration barometer” and is research on how Norwegians look at open borders.

This new poll from Norway has found that there is now record low support for more immigration to the country.

• Only 17% of Norwegians think that Norway should take in more immigrants.

• And 49% agree that Norway ”should not let in more immigrants.”

Not only that, but this new poll found that around 50% of people believe that open border has been been bad for Norwegian ”national character” and that it has been bad for ”social cohesion in Norwegian society”.

• And 48% of Norwegians believe that integration is going ”poorly” in the country.

So it seems like the message is clear. Norwegians have now become increasingly negative to open borders.

But, there is more.

People were also asked about remigration, something that has become more and more of a hot topic in recent years.

Norwegians were asked about if Norwegian authorities should send people back to their home country if the situation there improved.

And the results may surprise you.

• 49% said they supported voluntary returns (meaning that the person agreed to return home).

• 35% said they supported forced returns.

This means that 84% of the Norwegian population support remigration in some form.

For years, this position of remigration has been framed as ”far-right” by the establishment. But do you really believe that 84% of the Norwegian population are far-right?

What is also interesting is that the liberalist/right-wing party in Norway is now doing incredibly well in the latest opinion polls.

In the latest poll by InFact the FrP party got 33.3% making them by far the largest party in Norway. The Socialist party that is leading the government only got 22.4%, lagging far behind.

The FrP party are against woke and they strongly support restricting immigration and protecting the borders.

They want zero net immigration from what they call ”high risk countries”. These are countries defined as having low respect for Norwegian values, high use of welfare benefits, high levels of extremism and more.

However, they do have exceptions for groups like persecuted Christian minorities and other vulnerable groups from ”high risk countries”.

They also want asylum processing moved to outside of Europe.

So they want to heavily restrict immigration and they are doing extremely well in the polls, which fits with the latest integration poll that shows Norwegians becoming increasingly skeptic of open borders.

I’m bringing you the news that is being hidden by the mainstream media.

And I couldn’t do it without your support.

I’m not funded by people like Bill Gates.

So I need your help to continue bringing you news stories like this.

If you aren’t already, please consider becoming a paid subscriber to help support my independent journalistic work.

Your support helps me a lot more than you know. Thank you!

For just the price of a couple of coffees per month, you can support my work AND you get access to exclusive articles that you for sure do not want to miss.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

The Swedish Democrat party has gotten a lot of attention in Sweden the last few days.

Because they just announced that they will be campaigning for the upcoming election on banning the hijab in public in Sweden.

Not only do they want to ban full face coverings like the burqa and niqab, but they also want to go a step further and ban the hijab as well.

The hijab is the headscarf/veil.

There is an upcoming election in Sweden this year, and the Swedish Democrats announced this as part of their election campaign.

They want a total ban on the hijab and veil in public places.

In other words, this is a campaign promise from the party.

”Our position is clear. Headscarves, hijab, niqab and burqa does not belong in Sweden. Those who come to Sweden should adapt to Sweden, not the other way around. Sweden should stand up for freedom, equality and people’s right to shape their own lives.” said Sara Gille, the party spokesperson on equality and honor related issues.

”Our standpoint is that if you have these clothing items, then you can move to another country” said Sara Gille.

These statements are not coming from a small party. This is the right-wing party in Sweden and they became the second largest party in the country in the last election with around 20% of the votes.

Wait a minute.

While writing this, I just realized something. The Swedish Democrats now have a spokesperson on “honor related” issues. This is not something that we used to have before, as this was never something that existed in Sweden before. This is a new thing.

In the latest poll by SCB, the Socialist party is currently in the lead with almost 34% and the Swedish Democrat party coming in at second place with 18%.

As things stand, the left-wing coalition with the Socialists, former Communist party, Greens and the Center party would win a majority.

So as things are looking right now, the Swedish Democrats don’t look likely to get in power.

What do you think, would you support such a ban or is it an infringement on freedom of religion?

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

The right-wing government in Sweden has just made it significantly more difficult to obtain Swedish citizenship.

Beginning on the 6th of June, the Swedish National Day, it is now a completely different story for people to get citizenship.

But here is the thing. Really, these new laws sound like a basic common sense, something that should have been in place a long time ago.

So what are these new rules?

1. A new stricter rule for residency. People wishing to obtain Swedish citizenship must have lived 8 years in the country as opposed to only 5 years before. The 8 years must also have been continuous.

2. People must prove that they are able to support themselves financially. People must earn around $2200 per month to qualify. So people that are relying on benefits in Sweden will therefore generally not get citizenship anymore.

3. People must have had a ”orderly and honest life” to be allowed to get citizenship. This is to promote integration into Swedish life. If people commit crimes, there will be a delay in the possibility of getting citizenship.

4. Those seeking citizenship must now show sufficient knowledge of the Swedish language and Swedish society. So now people must be able to speak the Swedish language in order to become a citizen.

5. Children are now no longer automatically included in the parent’s citizen application. Children must have their own citizenship application.

There are a few more rules also that were changed, but these are some of the main ones.

So, people must now be able to speak Swedish to get Swedish citizenship. This sounds like obvious common sense to me. Why wasn’t this a rule before? I thought this should have been one of the first requirements to get citizenship, that you actually can speak the language of the country you are living in.

As the situation is now, many people in Stockholm don’t even speak Swedish anymore. In many Stockholm shops, English is spoken instead of Swedish.

Something very interesting has happened also. There are reports that the Swedish migration authorities have worked overtime to try and accept as many citizenship applications as possible before these new stricter rules came into effect.

Why would they do this?

Staff were required to work overtime on weekends and holidays to go through applications.

A politician from the Swedish Democrats accused the migration authorities of trying to obstruct the new stricter rules by working overtime to ”push through as many citizenship cases as possible” before the new rules applied.

Interesting.

But now at least Sweden has much stricter laws for getting citizenship.

However, if you ask me, many of these new rules are just common sense, which makes me wonder why these rules didn’t exist before?

People must be able to provide for themselves, life a honest and orderly life and be able to speak the language is just basic common sense if you ask me.

Sweden has had notoriously open borders previously, I guess the fact that we didn’t have these common sense rules before is one of the reasons.

Subscribe now

Share

UPDATE: A previous version of this article said the researchers had been arrested. However, they were not physically arrested, but are being charged.

Hold on a second here. What just happened???

This is very big, yet barely anything on the news.

A top virologist who works at the NIH has been charged with allegedly smuggling among other things monkeypox in to the USA.

And this guy doesn’t just work anywhere. He is the chief of the Virus Ecology unit at a MAXIMUM containment biolab facility in Montana.

Not only is he the chief, but he even established the unit himself.

And guess what they study?

They study how viruses can jump from animals to humans.

And now this researcher was allegedly illegally smuggling monkeypox virus into the USA.

And guess what?

This guy has been extensively studying Ebola.

Guess where he arrived from with the smuggled monkeypox virus?

The Republic of Congo, where there is now an Ebola outbreak.

”These NIH experts apparently broke our laws by smuggling viral pathogens on a packed commercial airplane from an outbreak in the Republic of Congo. Let that sink in” said U.S Attorney Jerome F. Gorgon Jr.

This shows that these top expert researchers have been extremely careless, smuggling viruses on commercial planes right under the nose of the public.

What is going on? I’m here to give you all the details that we know!

As an independent journalist, I don’t get millions in funding from big donors like Bill Gates.

With your support, I can reach even more people with news stories that is being hidden.

As much as I wish I could post all my articles and work for free, that is simply not possible as I cannot work for free (or I would starve…)

Doing investigative journalism and research takes a lot of time and hard work.

If you aren’t already, please become a paid subscriber today and you can read the rest of this article PLUS many more exclusive articles that you do not want to miss out on.

Your support is highly needed and much appreciated - Thank you so much!

Read more

It is now being reported that the United Nations is on track to run out of money by mid August as they are in an imminent financial crisis.

The UN is facing a severe liquidity crisis for their operating budget and that their available cash balance is only enough to pay for staff salaries etc. until the middle of August this year.

They have implemented energy conservation measures to try and save as much money as possible.

This means that they have been intermittently been shutting down elevators, turned down heating and air conditioning at their headquarters in Geneva and New York.

They have even turned off lights in corridors and meeting rooms. Other money saving measures include hiring freezes.

So the same organization that have been working hard to tell people that they must reduce carbon emissions, are now having to turn off their lights, heating and AC to save money as they are facing severe funding problems.

”The crisis is deepening, threatening programme delivery and risking financial collapse...I cannot overstate the urgency of the situation we now face” said UN Secretary General António Guterres already in January.

In other words, the UN is on track for a complete financial collapse. And it is imminent.

Oh, and did you know that years ago, Bill Gates donated $1.2 BILLION towards funding the UN Agenda 2030 Global Goals?

Yes, this included hundreds of millions towards global digital ID. But of course, you probably never heard about this on the news because they are protecting Bill Gates.

Why? Maybe it is because they are bought and paid for, seeing that Bill has “donated” over $319 million to various mainstream media, including the BBC.

But I did write about this and paid subscribers can read my in-depth article here.

It is really informative if you want to get a little look at what is going on behind the scenes.

But why this financial crisis?

The UN has simply not received money from major member states contributors.

A major reason here is that the Trump administration in the USA has been withholding funding to the UN to push for reforms.

The USA has around $4 billion in funding that is normally paid, however they have only paid around $160 million so far this year, leaving a massive budget deficit for the UN as the USA has been the largest funder.

And the USA is deliberately withholding money from the UN as they want to see reforms within the organization to increase efficiency, reduce bureaucracy, save money and more.

This has of already seen results with the UN coming up with massive cost cutting for their 2026 budget.

The USA has already announced their withdrawal from over 30 UN agencies, including the World Health Organization (WHO).

Why?

Because they promoted ”radical climate policies, global governance and ideological programs that conflict with US sovereignty and economic strength”.

They have withdrawn from among other the UN Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

It is clear that the UN is having a bad time, facing imminent financial collapse and are due to run out of money in just a few months.

A little note to my readers.

While the UN has been getting billions in funding over the years, including loads of money from Bill Gates…

I’m just an independent journalist that wants to bring people the news that you won’t find on the mainstream media.

Did you know that Bill Gates has donated over $319 million to the media? That means they are bought and paid for!

Of course, I don’t get the millions in funding from donors like Bill Gates that they do.

Which is why I need your help and continued support to be able to do this work.

Finding news stories that are hidden takes time and research.

If you want to help to continue bringing you new stories, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription. It helps me more than you know!

Subscribe now

Big news on the energy front coming from Italy.

Italy is now preparing to return to nuclear power after nearly 40 years without.

After the disaster at Chernobyl, Italy had a referendum in 1987 to phase out nuclear power.

This has meant that Italy has relied on renewable energy, import of gas and import of electricity.

But now the right-wing government under Georgia Meloni are working to find solutions to high energy costs (which we have seen all over Europe).

Now the government of Italy has announced that they will come with a new law to enable nuclear power to return which will be approved by this summer.

However, it is expected that this will eventually trigger a referendum in Italy where people can vote on it. It is expected that opponents will try to gather enough signatures to trigger this referendum.

And currently, the polls shows that there is around 50% support for building nuclear plants in Italy.

So with the new planned nuclear power plants, it means that Italy can produce much more electricity at home, instead of having to rely as much on imports.

The strategy is prioritizing something called small modular reactors (SMR) and advanced modular reactors (AMR).

They hope to achieve 8GWe of capacity by 2050, possibly going up to 16GWe which would cover over 20% of electricity demand.

These new generations of nuclear power plants that they want to build is not the same as those from before.

The SMR and AMR plants are both smaller and safer than previous generations of nuclear power plants.

In fact, they are dramatically safer, having around 50 to 100 times lower risk of damage to the core compared with nuclear power plants from the 1960s to 1980s.

The risk of a severe accident is estimated to be around 1 every millions to tens of million of reactor years.

Even if the very, very small chance of an accident happened, the damage would be minimal and contained to the plant site because of the design of these new reactors.

So even with the worst case scenario, models have shown that radioactive release into the environment would be minimal or even zero.

And that is for the SMR reactors which are Gen 3 reactors.

The Gen 4 reactors (AMR) actually are even safer than this. The way that they are designed makes a core melt or large release of radioactive material physically very difficult or in fact impossible.

So why have the climate fanatics been so much against nuclear power?

They have pushed very hard for removing nuclear power all across Europe. They have also demanded that fossil fuels be phased out. So what are we being left with?

We are being left with renewable energy, which is notoriously unreliable. Ironically, we have to rely on the weather being correct for produce renewable energy.

It is almost like the climate fanatics want us to not use energy or something.

Sure, renewable energy may have their place. But at the moment, if we just relied on them in Europe, we would probably run out of electricity pretty quick.

Nuclear power of course would be an excellent source of cheap energy.

A little note to my readers.

As you probably know, I’m just an independent journalist that wants to bring people the news that you won’t find on the mainstream media.

Of course, I don’t get the millions in funding from donors like Bill Gates that they do.

Which is why I need your help and continued support to be able to do this work.

Finding news stories that are hidden takes time and research.

If you want to help to continue bringing you new stories, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription. It helps more than you know!

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

What you are about to read is something that should never happen in a free country.

An elderly pastor held an open air Sunday service in Northern Ireland.

For this ”crime” the man was convicted in court.

It may sound unbelievable, but this is the world we live in now.

Subscribe now

The 78 year old preached a short and peaceful sermon based on the famous Bible verse John 3:16.

”For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever beleiveth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”

They also sang hymns.

So what happened? Police arrived at the scene telling him that he was in a ”safe access zone” and that preaching there (remember, he was in a public space) could be a ”reckless influence” on ”protected persons”.

Why?

Because there was a hospital nearby.

Yes, you read that correctly.

There was a hospital nearby that provided abortion facilities. And the patient/staff at the hospital doing or working on abortion are considered ”protected persons”.

For this, the pastor was convicted in court and ordered to pay £450 in fines and he now has a criminal record.

This means that in the UK you are not allowed to preach the gospel in merely the vicinity of where a ”protected person” could be.

You see, in the UK they have something called ”safe access zones” which exist within 100 meters (can be extended up to 250 meters) of a facility that provides abortion or places where information or counselling about abortion are provided.

They are also called ”buffer zones”.

If anyone within these zones do something that is considered influencing patients or staff, that is illegal.

And now the court has found that merely holding an open air Sunday service is illegal if it is to close to the hospital.

In the sermon, there was no mention of abortion whatsoever. There were no placards mentioning abortion either.

The sermon was focused on John 3:16.

So this was simply an open air service preaching the gospel that wasn’t a protest at all.

People in the UK have previously been arrested by police simply for praying silently in their head in the vicinity of an abortion facility.

Literally arrested for thought crimes.

”If simply reading the Bible, praying, and preaching on God’s love can now be considered harmful because someone might overhear it within a certain area, then we have crossed a very serious line” said the pastor.

So now we are at the point in the UK where Christians are being persecuted and convicted in court for the crime of preaching the gospel publicly on the street.

That is indeed a very serious line that has been crossed.

Not only is free speech under attack, but freedom of religion is also under attack.

Share

Well, what do we have here?

Not long ago I reported on how the vaccine maker Moderna had in fact begun development of an mRNA vaccine against hantavirus already in 2024.

What is also interesting is how they had a patent on a particular sequence that happened to also be in the covid virus. And this particular sequence is actually what made it unique and very infectious to humans. They got this patent years before the outbreak of covid.

Now, guess what?

The WHO has just declared a global health emergency over the Ebola outbreak that has happened in Africa.

Now the mainstream media has gone into full panic mode over Ebola, and it seems like the previous fearmongering over hantavirus just disappeared almost overnight.

Guess what I found?

Turns out that just some months ago Moderna began development of a new mRNA vaccine against Ebola with $26.7 MILLION in funding from an organization called CEPI.

This together with Oxford University who is also creating an Ebola vaccine on the same platform as the AstraZeneca covid vaccine.

Guess who is a major backer of this CEPI organization?

Bill Gates of course.

So what is going on?

Oh, and AI will be used to help develop this new Ebola vaccine to trigger a strong immune response.

You probably won’t hear about this on the media, but I will give you all the details here in this latest article.

Unlike the mainstream media who gets millions in funding from Bill Gates, I don’t get anything…

That’s why your support as a paid subscriber is highly appreciated and allows me to continue bringing you important articles with news that is not widely reported, such as this one!

Read more

Something disturbing has happened.

There has been a dramatic increase in the use of heart/cardiovascular medication among young people.

In fact, there has been more than 63% increase in the use of these medicines in the age group 30 to 34 in Norway.

And among those aged 15 to 19 years old, the use of these heart medications has increased by around 55%.

So when did this dramatic increase happen? Can you take a guess?

After 2020.

But of course, the media in Norway has been quick to assure us that this has nothing to do with the covid vaccines.

What’s going on?

I have evidence from a peer reviewed study showing that the likelihood of getting myocarditis was much higher from the covid mRNA vaccines than from covid itself.

Let me give you all the details...

Read more

A court ruling found that a woman got neurological injury from the injection.

Well, this is big news.

While it is big news in Italy, it is barely being reported anywhere in the media internationally.

Now the court in Italy has recently ruled that a woman got a neurological damage from the Pfizer covid vaccine and she is to receive compensation.

Just recently I reported on how the family of a woman who died from getting the AstraZeneca covid vaccine was awarded compensation in Greece.

And now we see a ruling from Italy where a woman is getting a quite LARGE compensation of over $40.000 per year for her vaccine injury.

Let me give you all the details of this case…

Read more

There was a very interesting detail during covid that most people missed, in large part because it wasn’t really reported on by the mainstream media.

That detail was something that really makes one think.

Back in 2016, Moderna applied for a patent that included a specific 19 nucelotide sequence.

This is 100% complementary match of what was found near the furin cleavage site in the covid virus.

And this part of the patent was part of a codon optimized synthetic mRNA that was designed by Moderna to produce a part of a human protein.

Now, the furin cleavage site is something that makes covid unique compared to the closest virus relative.

And this furin cleavage site is why the covid virus was so effective in infecting humans.

So this very thing that was unusual with the covid virus and made it so effective in infecting humans, Moderna had a patent for that nucelotide sequence.

Researchers say this is ”highly unusual” but that there is a possibility this happened naturally.

Now, guess what I found.

Moderna began working on an mRNA vaccine for hantavirus in 2024.

It’s also been reported that Moderna stock has jumped 10% amid the hantavirus outbreak.

You may have seen the fearmongering on the news recently about the hantavirus outbreak on the cruise ship.

So what is going on?

Let me tell you some more details about Moderna and their hantavirus vaccine project…

Oh, and now the WHO boss just used hantavirus as an example of why the USA should reconsider leaving the organization that they just left some months ago...

Become a paid subscriber today to support my independent journalism AND get access to exclusive articles such as the rest of this one.

Your support allows me to continue bringing you the news that is being ignored by the mainstream media!

Read more

This is quite big news that I have not seen reported much in the media, so I will be bringing you this news.

Subscribe now

Quite frankly, this is a LANDMARK decision. The state is now being held responsible for harm that came from public health policy.

A Greek court has just ruled in favor of the family being paid compensation after a woman died from the AstraZeneca covid vaccine.

The court has held the state responsible as the woman got the vaccine as part of the national vaccination campaign.

You might remember how people were really pushed towards getting vaccinated, with massive fear mongering being spread by the media constantly.

She suffered the now infamous blood clot side effect known as vaccine induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia.

The court found that there was a direct link between her getting the AstraZeneca vaccine and her death. She didn’t have any other underlying diseases or health issues. In other words, she was perfectly healthy before receiving the injection.

And now the Greek state has been held liable for her death and has been ordered by the court to pay compensation.

The defense claimed that the vaccination was ”voluntary” and therefore the state shouldn’t be liable. But this did not hold up in court. AstraZeneca however were not deemed to be liable.

So essentially the state argued that the vaccine was voluntary. But in reality it was heavily promoted by the state as part of public health policy.

Total compensation awarded was €300.000 with €120.000 going to the husband and €90.000 to the two daughters.

Share