Just when you thought that Britain could not get more Orwellian, it just did.

British police recently arrested a 15 year old boy and you won’t believe what they actually arrested him for. It really is unbelievable how this can happen in a country that calls itself democratic.

Police arrived at his home in the morning. They came prepared for such a case as this. Four police officers with two police cars.

The police took him outside and searched him in view of his neighbours before putting him in the police car and taking him to the station.

Police took his fingerprints, DNA and mugshot before placing him in a cell. Police also seized his devices.

Now, what on earth could have warranted such a police response against a 15 year old boy you may ask?

He was arrested for posts on facebook that criticized and ridiculed a politician from the Conservative party.

That’s it. For this, four police officers came and arrested the boy at his house.

Police have not clarified exactly what supposed crime the boy is suspected of and neither has he been charged with any crime and remains on bail.

The 15 year old boy had posted on social media commenting on and criticizing the politicians choice of clothes.

He had also criticized the politician for looking at his phone during a meeting.

And he had also posted an AI edited image of the politician with rabbit ears, whiskers and rabbit teeth with a text implying that the politician was making the Conservative party lose credibility.

The boy is a political activist for the Reform UK party and he believes his arrest was politically motivated.

So we are now at the point where Britain is ARRESTING children for criticizing and ridiculing politicians on the internet.

Over 12.000 people are arrested every year in Britain under ”communications offences” with many being for posts on social media.

In other words, Britain has a thought police now and they are arresting even children.

Britain cannot be considered a free country anymore.

Subscribe now

I have previously reported on several shocking court rulings from Sweden and now it has happened yet again.

A 37 year old man from Syria has been convicted by the Swedish court for repeated rapes against a child.

However, he will NOT be deported from Sweden and the reasoning given by the court is absolutely shocking.

The victim is a girl who was around 10 years old when the attacks began and it continued until she was 13 years old. She was the stepdaughter of the convicted man. The victim, her mother and the convicted man lived in the same house.

When she first told her mother about what was going on, she did not believe her.

However, eventually a police report was made and the man was taken to court, needing an Arabic interpreter during the trial despite getting permanent residence permit in Sweden all the way back in 2014.

But you won’t believe the court ruling.

The migration authorities said there was nothing hindering his deportation.

However, the court ruled AGAINST deportation.

Why is that you may ask?

Because the court deemed that the man had strong ties to Sweden.

Instead, they only sentenced the man to 5 years in prison and he has to pay around $54,500 in compensation to the girl.

He will be allowed to stay in Sweden.

So let me understand this correctly.

The man raped a girl that saw him as her father. Now the court rules that he must not be deported from Sweden because a deportation would ”affect...his children quite severely”?

I don’t understand what on earth is going on here with these Swedish court rulings. Absolutely unbelievable.

And this is not the first shocking court case from Sweden. There is now an ongoing pattern of court rulings that are unbelievable.

I previously reported on how a man in his 40s was set free by the court after raping a 14 year old girl, with the court saying in their verdict that the girl could ”simply leave” during the attack.

Sweden has a rape crisis.

Things are so bad now that 17.9% of 15 year old girls report having been the victim of a sexual crime in Sweden.

You can read my article on the truth about the Swedish rape crisis here.

There has now been many shocking court cases from Sweden. I really don’t understand how this is possible.

It shouldn’t be possible.

And the mainstream media has largely been covering up or ignoring what has been going on in Sweden.

But I will report on it.

Subscribe now

Share

Some very big things just happened in the EU parliament.

Essentially, they just voted in favor of stopping political islam in Europe.

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the need for an EU strategy to counter what they call ”islamist entryism” which they say ”aims to weaken European values”.

So what exactly do they mean by this?

That ”islamist entryism” is ”a political strategy of influence, progressive structuring, institutional penetration and ideological legitimisation”

And furthermore it talks about political islam, describing it ”as a societal project, which seeks to produce collective norms, derogatory regimes or community allegiances placed above common law”.

In Sweden, we now already have the first self proclaimed sharia court where people can agree to settle civil disputes under sharia law instead of under Swedish law.

The EU parliament is calling for a methodology in the EU to identify what they call “islamist entryism” and network structures.

They also want better checks and control on EU funding and partnerships that could go to things that ”may benefit political islam”.

They are also calling for stronger visa controls and cross border cooperation.

In the EU press release, it says they ”condemn the strategies of islamist entryism, which aims to weaken European values, democratic institutions, and public order and social cohesion”.

Furthermore, it says that Europe can ”no longer fund, consult or legitimise networks that use its language, procedures and funding to weaken its values from within”.

That is not all. The EU press release also says that anti-discrimination policies must not be used to stop criticism or to legitimize organised islamist networks.

The Brothers of Italy party which are in government in Italy right now, added an amendment to the resolution that was passed regarding burqa and niqab.

This means that the EU parliament believes that covering up the face in public ”poses an unacceptable challenge to public security” and that MEPs support national measures in EU countries aimed at BANNING full face coverings such as the burqa and niqab in public.

They say this is necessary for social cohesion, public safety and protecting the rights and freedoms in particular for women.

This comes as Italy just banned full face coverings at school.

In other words, it is now the position of the EU parliament that they support national bans on the burqa and niqab in Europe.

Things seem to be changing in Europe now. It is difficult to imagine that something like this would be adopted by MEPs just 10 years ago.

So, how did the vote go? I have some very interesting news to give you that you probably never heard about in the news.

The right and the liberals voted YES on this resolution.

However, the left, the center left and the greens voted AGAINST it.

You heard that correctly.

Almost all the left-wing or green party politicians in the European parliament voted AGAINST this resolution calling for a strategy to prevent political islam in Europe.

This includes the Swedish Socialist Democrat party that just won the Swedish election. They voted against stopping political islam in Europe.

It is being reported that the left-wing groups boycotted the resolution and it has been reported they think it is ”stigmatizing” people.

So there you have it.

The right just voted for a strategy to protect European values, democracy and freedom.

The left just voted AGAINST stopping political islam in Europe.

You probably won’t read about it like this in the news, that the left did this.

But you will read about it from me.

If you appreciate my work as an independent journalist, please consider supporting me with a paid subscription.

Your support is much needed!

Subscribe now

The right-wing government of Italy has just adopted a new decree to BAN face coverings in school. This includes both students, teachers and parents.

Not only that, but Italy has also set a limit on the number of students per classroom who has not completed a certain amount of school in Italy previously, in order to promote better integration.

So it is forbidden in both curricular and extracurricular school activities to wear full face coverings such as the burqa or niqab or other full face coverings. The hijab will be allowed since it does not cover the face.

This includes at things such as school meetings or school events, meaning that parents attending there can’t have their faces covered.

Violations of this new law can give fines of up to €1000.

This means that if a parent sends their child to school with a full face covering such as a with a burqa, the parent can get a fine of up to €1000.

Teachers will also not be allowed to wear face coverings and if they do, they will risk the same fine.

In addition to this, there is now also a limit on how the number of students allowed in each classroom that lack previous exposure to Italian school.

For primary school, the limit applies to students who do not have Italian citizenship, are not born in Italy and have not attended at least two years of of Italian preschool before.

For secondary school the limit applies to students who are not Italian citizens or were not born in Italy and have not completed three years in the Italian school system.

The new law states that there can be no more than 30% of students in any given classroom that are in the criteria listed above.

This is being done to promote integration and ensure that students learn sufficient Italian. The reasoning is that if many students lack sufficient Italian skills in a classroom, it makes it more difficult with integration and learning the Italian language. If a majority of the classroom consist of students that speak Italian well, that will become the dominating language and new students will more easily learn Italian.

In addition to all this, if authorities deem that parents lack Italian skills and this hinders a child’s integration, parents can be ordered to attend free Italian courses. Parents who refuse to learn Italian could risk being fined up to €1000.

This comes as the neighbouring country of Austria has BANNED the hijab, burqa and niqab in schools for girls aged under 14 years old. Austria is presenting this as a measure to protect children.

If the ban is ignored, parent will risk a fine of up to €800 or a prison sentence if the fine is not paid.

It seems like things are beginning to change in Europe.

Subscribe now

Share

It has begun. The first self proclaimed ”independent sharia court” opened in Sweden, and this happened already last year.

This is an arbitration service that is offered by a private company where people can choose to have their civil disputes settled under sharia law instead of Swedish law.

And if both parties consent to the sharia law arbitration, the rulings issued by this ”sharia court” can be legally binding under Swedish arbitration laws.

People will need to pay a fee to use this firm and hearings will be private. The firm already has collaborations in both Stockholm and Malmö.

This means that awards issued under this sharia law can be enforced and sent to the Enforcement Authority in Sweden, just like a real court judgement.

The founder of this firm has a background in both the center-right Moderate party, before leaving for the former Communist party. However, he left this party and joined the Green party. But he was kicked out by them.

He was also in the foster home business, where his company focused on housing unaccompanied minors that arrived in Sweden.

Sweden paid his company around $5,400 per month (with today’s exchange rate) for every unaccompanied minor that they housed.

The fact that Sweden has now gotten the first self appointed sharia court, should act as a reminder how Sweden has been changing.

There are already many areas in Sweden where parallel societal structures have formed, areas where police say that there are systemic violations of religious freedom.

Furthermore, there are reports of self appointed ”morality police” that enforce strict rules on women and attempt to impose sharia like rules in certain areas of Sweden.

There has even been reports of these ”religious enforcers” patrolling the streets and attacking women that they deemed to have the ”wrong” clothes that did not follow their religion.

In other words, there is growing religious extremism in Sweden.

Police have also warned that in some areas, there is a ”local social order” that challenges the Swedish democratic social order and Swedish law.

It is clear that we are seeing parallel societies forming in Sweden that adheres to another law than Swedish law.

And now people can use an arbitration service to get legally binding sharia law rulings in Sweden.

This would have been unheard of in Sweden just some years ago.

Now it is happening.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

The Swedish election has been really interesting and it has made one thing very clear.

Open borders prevented the right from winning the election.

And I will prove it with statistics.

And in one area with a very high population of people with a foreign background, the left got a whopping 97,6% of the votes. You read that correctly.

Here is my political analysis of the Swedish election.

First of all, we do not have the final result yet. Because of a delay by the postal service in delivering early voting, authorities could not count all the votes on election night.

But that doesn’t really matter. Because the election is EXTREMELY close. With around 95% of the votes counted right now, the left is at 49,6% and the right is at 49% with only around 30.000 vote difference between them. Keep this in mind.

Going forward, when I mention the left wing bloc, these are the parties that make up the left, just so you understand that the left bloc consists of far left parties.

• The Social Democrats (Socialists).

• The Left (until 1990 they were called the Left Party the Communists)

• The Greens.

• The Center party.

So what happened?

According to the exit poll made by Valu on Swedish state TV, 70% of voters with a non European background voted for the left. This is significant. Let me explain why.

The Swedish online newspaper Bulletin did some research and they estimate that around 13% of those eligible to vote in the 2026 election had a non European background. Allthough they did not use the exact same definition of non European background as the Valu exit poll, they are similar enough to give us a reasonable comparison.

Meaning that around 1.05 million people with a non European background could vote.

What does this mean, how many votes will this group of voters have given the left?

Firstly, we need to look at voter turnout. In the last election, in certain areas where almost all of the population have a non European foreign background, there was around 55% voter turnout. Among all foreign born voters (including with European background) the turnout was 67%.

Subscribe now

This election, the left had a large campaign to mobilize voters from this group. The Social Democrats for example ran election campaign in Arabic to reach voters in this group so it is safe to assume that voter turnout would probably be higher than before.

Let us use very, very conservative numbers here and estimate that the voter turnout was around 55% for the group of voters with a non European background.

Combine this with the exit poll showing that 70% voted for the left.

This would mean that the left got around 400.000 votes from voters with a non European background.

Again, these 400.000 votes would be a very conservative number. It could well be more.

So if this estimate is correct, it would mean around 400.000 votes out of the around 3.2 million votes that the left got right now in this election comes from this group of voters.

Now consider that the left is currently leading by only around 30.000 votes, the picture becomes clear.

These votes for the left stopped the right from winning a clear victory in the election.

But here is the thing that makes it even more interesting.

The right wing bloc won the previous election in 2022. But since then Sweden has granted citizenship to around 200.000 people, with people from Syria, Eritrea, Afghanistan and Somalia being among the largest groups that got granted citizenship.

In other words, people with a non European background accounted for the large majority of those 200.000 that got granted citizenship within the last 4 years by the right wing government. They now have full voting rights.

If you do the math here, statistically it is highly likely that because the right wing government granted these citizenships, they lost the election, considering the very close margins.

If the right wing government had paused granting these citizenships, they would very likely have won the election.

Now let us take a look at a few areas in Sweden and how they voted.

What about Central Rinkeby, which is a suburb of Stockholm. The left here got 93,9% of the votes in this election district. Around 93% of the population here have a foreign background.

In Rosengård, which is a suburb of Malmö, the left won with 97,6% of the votes. In this election district, around 95% of the population have a foreign background.

And in Central Tensta, the left won with 94,7% of the votes. Again, around 94% of the population in this election district have a foreign background.

Just for a little comparison, 35.7% of the entire population of Sweden now has a foreign background. You can read more about that in my previous article here.

Now you know why the left has been a massive supporter of open borders.

It is a political strategy from the left to stay in power.

They keep the borders open and in return get many new voters.

The Swedish election results have made this clearer than ever before.

If Sweden did not have open borders, the right would have won this election.

I hope you appreciate my political analysis. You will not get this kind of political analysis from the mainstream media.

Please consider supporting my work with a paid subscription, your support is highly appreciated and will help me to continue this important work as an independent journalist!

Subscribe now

Share

Recently, I have been reporting on several shocking court cases that has happened in Sweden.

Now another one just took place. And you will not believe the reasoning that the court gave.

On the 1st of September, a 24 year old man was set FREE by the Swedish court after raping a 13 year old girl.

The court in their verdict claimed that the man ”should not have realized the risk” that the girl was underage.

This despite the girl herself stating that she had told the man that she was 14 (though she was actually only 13).

However, the court did not believe the statement from the girl. Instead, they listened to other witnesses that claimed the man had appeared shocked when he heard of her age.

But the court case gets even more shocking.

As part of the reasoning to set the man free, here is a quote from the court verdict:

”The court’s assessment is that the complainant looked considerably older than her age”.

So the court set the man free. Absolutely unreal.

Now, in this court case, there was 3 lay judges and 1 professional judge. The lay judges are often politically appointed. The lay judges all ruled to set the man free, forming the majority opinion.

However, the professional judge dissented, saying that ”it is clear that she is a very young person”.

In other words, the professional judge wanted the man convicted.

The prosecutor is appealing the acquittal.

Not long ago, I reported on how a man in his 40s was also set acquitted by the Swedish court after raping a 14 year old girl in a park.

Part of the reasoning that the court gave in that verdict was that the girl could ”simply leave” during the attack.

What on earth is going on in Sweden with these court cases.

They are victim blaming.

I’m lost for words.

Between 2020 to 2025, there has been a shocking 58,053 reported rapes in Sweden.

And things are so bad now that 17,9% of 15 year old girls report having been a victim of a sexual crime in Sweden.

Sweden has one of the highest number of reported rapes in the world.

And a large number of rapes actually go unreported, so the real figures are much, much higher.

It is estimated that around 80-90% of sexual crimes in Sweden go unreported.

Things really are bad in Sweden now, and most people have no idea because the mainstream media all over the world is suppressing this.

But I will report on it.

Subscribe now

Share

It has happened.

Portugal just banned people from concealing their face in public places.

This means that it is now illegal for people to cover their face with a face veil such as with a burqa or niqab.

There are a few exceptions such as religious places and for situations justified by reasons such as health reasons or artistic reasons.

In practice, it will be illegal to wear full face veils in virtually all public places.

And the reasoning is ”for reasons of security and public order”.

Other aspects for this new law is social integration, social trust and that the ability to recognize each other is indispensable in a democratic and free society.

If anyone is found to intentionally violate this new law, they risk fines of up to €3000.

But it doesn’t stop there.

And if anyone is found to force someone to conceal their face on the basis of being man or a woman, they can be sentence up to 2 years in prison.

This means that if a man forces a woman to wear a burqa or niqab by ”coercion, abuse of authority or abuse of power”, he can be sent to prison for 2 years.

If the victim is a minor, the sentence is increased so that the prison sentence could be 2 years and 8 months.

This law was originally initiated by the right-wing Chega party.

However, the left in Portugal has been strongly opposed to this new law.

The Communists claimed that this law will be ”continuing to feed hate speech”.

Another leftist party called Livre has accused the right-wing of creating a ”moral panic”.

The Socialist party were also strongly opposed to this law.

The right wants to protect women from being forced to cover their face.

The right wants to protect the democratic and free society.

And the left goes into a panic over it.

Subscribe now

I have previously reported on several shocking court cases from Sweden.

And now there is another one that I found.

In the summer of 2022, a woman in her 40s was gang raped twice by four men with Eritrean citizenship.

The first attack happened in a forest area near a train station. All four men took part in the gang rape.

Then they took the woman back to the train station where two of the men gang raped her again while another stood guard.

These were horrible attacks.

But the sentence the men got will probably shock you.

Three of the men were convicted of aggravated rape and were sentenced to only 5 years and 6 months in prison. The fourth man was convicted of rape and was sentenced to 2 years and 3 months prison.

All the men were convicted on the 30th December of 2022. But all the men are FREE today as they were eligible for early conditional release.

Let that sink in.

Here are four men that gang raped a woman and they are already back on the streets of Sweden after just a few years.

But that is not all.

All four men have citizenship from Eritrea. The prosecutor asked for deportation with a 15 year ban on returning to Sweden.

However, the court ruled that the men would NOT be deported.

The Swedish Migration Agency claimed that there was a risk the men could be subject to ”treatment similar to persecution” of they were deported back to their homeland.

Why you may ask?

Because all four men had fled Eritrea illegally in order to avoid mandatory military conscription in the country.

So, based on humanitarian grounds, Sweden did NOT deport these men and they are now set free and are walking the streets of Sweden just a few years after this horrendous attack.

This is Sweden. Not only did they not get deported, but they are released from prison after just a few years.

Not long ago, I reported on several shocking court cases that recently happened in Sweden.

One of the shocking court cases was were a man in his 40s was set FREE by the court after raping a 14 year old girl in a park.

And part of the reasoning from the court was that they claimed the girl could ”simply leave”.

This is unreal.

What is going on in Sweden?

The unreal court rulings just keep happening again and again.

Something is wrong.

Subscribe now

Christians are the most persecuted religious group in the world.

Yet you almost never hear anything about this on the news.

The world needs to know the truth and I will tell you about it.

The organization Open Doors released their World Watch List 2026, where they track severity of the persecution that Christians are facing around the world.

In case you didn’t know, this organization was founded by a man who was famous for smuggling Bibles into the Soviet Union. Already back then, the far left did not like Christianity.

So, what are the figures in the latest World Watch List? It is bad.

First of all, it is important to remember that the figures you are about to read are conservative numbers, the real numbers are likely to be much, much higher because of under reporting.

Over 388 million Christians now face high levels of persecution for their faith. This is up from 380 million in the year before.

This means that around 1 in 7 Christians worldwide face high levels of persecution for the faith.

81 countries are listed where Christians face high, very high or extreme levels of persecution.

Do you realize what this means?

This means that we are not far off from the point where almost HALF of ALL the countries on earth are places where Christians face high levels of persecution.

At some point, you have to ask yourself this question. Why isn’t this being reported all over the news?!

Furthermore, 25,794 houses, shops, businesses or other properties belonging to Christians were attacked. That is a lot.

In addition to this, another 3,632 churches and other public Christian properties were attacked in just a 1 year period.

But it doesn’t stop there. There are also a lot of Christian people who would qualify for being refugees.

A whopping 224,129 Christians were forced to leave their homes, go into hiding in their country or leave their country entirely because of persecution for being a Christian.

In Nigeria for example, large numbers of Christians have had to flee their homes because of attacks by islamists.

There is also something that is called community expulsion of converts, where Christian converts get expelled and forced out of their villages or homes by family members or village elders because of their faith.

This is reportedly common in Laos where Christians are often given ultimatums of recanting their faith or being forced to leave. Often their homes are also destroyed.

Just now in June, Open Doors reported on how Christian families were expelled in Laos because they converted to Christianity.

In one village, six families were exiled. They were given an ultimatum to recant. They refused and they all chose to remain faithful to Jesus. As a result, their homes were destroyed and they were forced out of the village.

So, over 200,000 Christians were forced to leave their homes, go into hiding or leave their country because of persecution for their faith.

These people are actual refugees. Yet we never hear anything about them in the news. That seems very weird to me. Why is the media ignoring them?

Again, it is important to remember that these figures are conservative. The real numbers are likely much higher because of under reporting.

It is clear that Christians are the most persecuted religious group in the world. Daily, Christians are having to endure hardship and persecution because they choose to follow Jesus.

Yet we never hear about it.

Even though it is increasingly happening in the West also. Just look at the UK. They have already begun arresting people for preaching.

An elderly pastor was convicted in court for preaching in the UK. All he did was holding an open air Sunday service that was considered to be in the ”wrong” place.

You may also not have heard about how Christians were severely persecuted in the Soviet Union.

In far-left ideology, atheism is the state religion. They believe that the state is their god and should be in complete control over humanity.

Now, I want to tell you about a story that has barely been reported.

This took place in the Soviet Union. Soldiers from the Red Army arrived at a church, chased out the congregation and forced them into a barn. The far-left soldiers then closed the doors and piled up flammable items against the barn door and lit it all on fire.

As the flames began burning up the building, there was the sound of the Christians inside that began singing the old hymn ”Rock of Ages, cleft for me, let me hide myself in thee”.

This is a real story that was reported in a Christian magazine from Sweden in 1932.

And I am sure that you never learned about this in school.

It is time to educate the world on the terrible persecution that Christians have suffered, not only now, but also the last 2000 years.

Subscribe now

Share

Remember how the brand new mRNA covid vaccines were pushed everywhere by the ”experts” and the mainstream media as being ”safe and effective”?

I remember.

There was a massive propaganda push everywhere about supposedly how safe these new mRNA vaccines were.

Those who dared to question this narrative were quickly branded as ”conspiracy theorists”.

In 2022, I discovered something strange. Something weird was happening with the birthrates. And it just happened to coincide with the rollout of the mRNA vaccines.

And I found some very interesting data back then that of course was completely ignored by the mainstream media.

For example, in Taiwan, there was almost a 30% drop in births from 2021 to 2022.

I also found data that showed that unvaccinated mothers in the age groups 20 to 29 in the UK had many more births than vaccinated mothers.

This of course made me wonder what on earth was going on.

Birthrates in Sweden have collapsed after 2021. In 2021, there was 114.300 babies born. In 2025 that number had dropped to only 97.491.

That means that in just a few years, the birthrates have dropped by almost 15%.

This is not normal.

Now it has been revealed that Fauci himself had privately warned about potential risk of miscarriage linked to the covid vaccines.

All the way back in 2021, Fauci was discussing covid vaccination and pregnancy with the then CDC director and a Biden covid advisor.

Fauci mentioned that people got significant cytokine storms after the 2nd dose, something that in theory could be associated with miscarriage in pregnant women.

So, in private, Fauci warned about potential miscarriage risks.

However, Fauci did not tell the public about these concerns.

We also know now that menstrual bleedings are a side effect of the covid vaccines. The European medicine agency officially listed it as such.

One study that looked at 78.138 vaccinated women, found that 39.759 of them suffered from menstrual problems after getting the covid vaccine. So over 50% of women in this particular study.

It is only natural to suspect that if women have menstrual disorders, that this could affect fertility.

Do you remember how we were told that the mRNA vaccines would stay at the injection site? That was a lie.

A study found that the mRNA itself had spread to the placenta and umbilical cord.

”Our findings suggest that the vaccine mRNA is not localized to the injection site and can spread systematically to the placenta and umbilical cord blood. The detection of the spike protein in the placental tissue indicates the bioactivity of the vaccine mRNA that reach the placenta”.

Of course, nobody in the media told you about this. But I wrote and warned about this years ago.

The establishment in unison promoted the covid mRNA vaccines to the point that anyone who dared raise questions were branded a ”conspiracy theorist”.

They told us to ”trust the science” and ”trust the experts”.

But this was actually ANTI science.

True science would have allowed people to ask questions and be skeptical.

The reason that I could write about this years ago, is because I’m not funded by people like Bill Gates.

Your continued support is very important and helps me to be able to bring you the news stories that is being censored by the media!

Subscribe now

Share

The last months have been very distressing for me.

It has come to my attention that a private investigator has been used to spy on me and my wife.

It turned out that this was on behalf of family relatives.

They have gotten the idea that my wife is “brain controlling” me with secret advanced tech. I know, it sounds, and it is, ludicrous.

I don’t know what to say even.

After months of harassment and stalking, they are now blackmailing me.

They have threatened me, saying they will publish hate articles full of lies and slander about my wife unless I agree to do certain things that they want to force me to do.

There is of course no actual blackmail, it is just made up lies and slander.

And I’m sure everyone will see right through the lies and slander.

Over the years I have received a lot of hate and attacks from the left and the mainstream media because I’m not afraid to report the truth.

I have also received hate from the actual far-right (not the imaginary far-right that the left complains about all the time).

But I never thought that the attacks could come from my own family because they suddenly have gotten an irrational hatred towards my wife.

I don’t understand this and it makes me extremely sad.

It is a massive betrayal, especially after all the things me AND my wife have done for them.

One thing is for sure.

I’m not backing down.

Never. Ever.

Please pray for my family, as what they are putting me and my wife through right now is completely out of character.

This is a very difficult situation for us.

Again, I’m never backing down.

I will never stop reporting the truth.

I have faced difficulties in the past and I have never let that stop me.

I hope you can trust that I’m not someone that will bow down under pressure.

And, if you want to help support me in this difficult time, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription if you don’t have one already.

Your support helps me to be able to continue the work that I do, bringing you the news stories that is not getting enough attention in the world.

I’m very grateful for you, my reader. Your show of support means a lot.

Subscribe now

This is big.

After the crisis in Ceuta where tens of thousands of people from Morocco stormed the borders of Europe, Italy is now leading the push to protect the borders.

It is estimated that around 72,000 people entered into European territory in Ceuta in a short period of time.

Despite what has been reported in the news that almost everybody returned, it seems like a significant number of people are still in Ceuta. Local officials in Ceuta estimate that up to 5,000 people are still there.

Spain is even planning to transfer what they say are unaccompanied minors that arrived in Ceuta over to mainland Spain as local facilities are overloaded.

The Spanish Prime Minister has told people to have ”positive solidarity”.

Italy has already temporarily suspended Schengen with Spain and begun border controls as a result of what happened in Ceuta.

”Defending the borders mean defending the security of citizens” Prime Minister Georgia Meloni said in a statement.

But it doesn’t stop there.

Italy is now leading the push for the EU to fund RETURN HUBS in third countries that is located outside the European Union.

Italy and Denmark requested an extraordinary EU meeting after the Ceuta crisis. In this meeting, Italy has advocated for the return hub proposal.

Spain however, was opposed to Italy’s return hub proposal. They think it could undermine fundamental rights and the values of the EU. They even called on Italy to lift their newly introduced border controls with Spain.

The return hubs proposed by Italy would be located in safe third countries outside of the EU and will act as a deterrent against people coming illegally into Europe.

People who have gotten a deportation order would be sent outside the European Union to one of these return hubs.

Some suggested countries where these return hubs could be located are among other Uganda, Ghana, Senegal and Tunisia.

And now Italy wants the EU to fund a network of these return hubs.

It was not long ago that the EU Parliament voted yes to approve the new Return Regulation.

So it looks like things might be changing in Europe.

Italy is now leading the push to protect the borders and want the EU to have a network of return hubs where people can be sent.

This is significant.

Protecting the borders is just commons sense.

Having open borders is extremism.

Support my independent journalism.

Upgrade to become a paid subscriber today to get access to exclusive articles.

And help fund this important work that I do.

Mainstream media has lots of funding to spread their censored news.

I need your support to be able to bring you the REAL news.

Subscribe now

Something is happening in Italy.

Italian authorities have opened a criminal investigation into the captain of a NGO ship that claimed to be rescuing people in the Mediterranean Sea.

The ship brought a large number of people from near the coast of Libya and dropped them off in Italy.

But now Italy is suspecting that they could have been coordinating together with people smugglers in order to bring people illegally into Europe.

And they have aerial surveillance video from Frontex as evidence.

The NGO vessel departed on the 6th of May this year for what they call a search and rescue mission.

On the 11th of May, the NGO vessel finds a boat carrying around 90 people, with most of them reportedly being from Bangladesh.

Wait a minute. Why are people from Bangladesh in a boat on the Mediterranean Sea near Libya to begin with?

So the NGO transfers the people onto their ship. However, here is where things become weird.

There were also five masked men aboard the boat. After the other people had been transferred onto the NGO ship, the five masked men restart the engine of their boat, reportedly give a thumbs up to the NGO crew and then they leave south back towards the African continent.

The NGO vessel found the boat around 100km north of Tripoli in Libya. But now they had to the port in Brindisi in southern Italy which is over 1000km away and took almost 4 days of sailing.

On the way to Italy, the NGO ship finds and takes onboard more people.

The ship docks in Italy with 166 people onboard, now mainly from Bangladesh, Egypt, Syria and Eritrea.

The NGO themselves claim that they were rescuing these people and that they were in distress.

But the sea was calm when the transfer of the people onto the ship took place.

Now the Italian authorities are investigating the captain of the NGO ship for ”aiding and abetting unauthorized immigration”.

It is being suspected that this wasn’t a genuine distress rescue, but that the NGO worked together with smuggling networks to bring people illegally into the country.

If eventually found guilty, the captain is facing up to 20 years prison.

When people arrive in Europe after disembarking these NGO ships, they are usually often met by other NGOs that help them further, giving them resources and advice. One such charity is Oxfam that has at least previously been operating in Italy to help the newly arrived people with everything they need. Usually they will continue their journey further north, to countries like Sweden.

The mainstream media has constantly portrayed these NGO ships as just doing rescue operations in the Mediterranean to help people who are in distress out at sea.

But it would seem now that they have actually been working together with organized networks to bring people illegally into Europe.

This should be headline news everywhere.

But of course this goes against the agenda of the mainstream media, because they support open borders.

But in so doing, it would seem they are indirectly supporting smuggling networks who exploit and put people at risk out on the sea.

Most of the media won’t report on this.

But I will.

If you appreciate the work that I do as an independent journalist, please upgrade to a paid subscriber if you haven’t already.

The mainstream media gets millions from people like Bill Gates. I don’t.

Subscribe now

A 19 year old Swedish woman has been convicted in court after warning about a man who had been convicted of committing sexual offense against a 13 year old girl.

It was true that the man was convicted. What the woman said was true. Yet this woman has now been convicted of ”gross defamation” for speaking out. And the reasoning from the court will shock you.

This 19 year old woman was a friend of the 13 year old girl and had testified against the man in court. She had even helped the girl get away from the man.

However, she encountered the man again in 2025 during a leisure activity in which this man and others were involved in.

There was a private group chat with around 20 members linked to this leisure activity. So she decided to warn the others in the group chat about this man.

The man was also in the same group chat and he reported her for defamation.

And this is what she was convicted for. She warned about a convicted sex offender that had attacked a 13 year old girl.

It didn’t matter that it was true that the man was convicted. The court decided to convict the woman of ”of gross defamation” anyway.

Now she must pay around $3100 in compensation to the convicted man.

So essentially what happened here was this. A man committed sexual crimes against a 13 year old girl, and now he is earning money because others have warned about him. This just should not be able to happen. It is a scandal.

Here is the reasoning from the court for convicting the woman.

”It is noted that the message and its information were based on an event that took place approximately three years ago. The public interest in disclosing the information cannot therefore be considered to have been of significant weight, and the District Court assesses that it was not justifiable...to disclose the information. The fact that it was true is then of no relevance to the assessment.” the court writes in the verdict.

So the court admits that what she said was true. But the court claims that there wasn’t any public interest for the woman to warn others about what he had done because the conviction took place 3 years ago. Therefore the court claims it was not ”justifiable” for her to do warn others.

Absolutely unbelievable. How does the court even come up with something like this?

But there is more. The woman was 17 years old when she warned the others in the group chat, had she been 18 years old, she would have risked being sent up to 2 years in prison instead.

Imagine that. In Sweden, people can be sent to 2 years in prison for warning others about a man that was convicted of sexual crimes against a 13 year old child.

This news comes shortly after a man in his 40s was set free by the court after raping a 14 year old girl in a Stockholm park.

In that case, part of the reasoning from the court in setting the man free, was because the court claimed that the 14 year old girl could ”simply leave”. So the court victim blamed the girl and claimed she could have stopped the attack herself.

Absolutely unbelievable.

So we have now had two court cases recently that is completely shocking. These kind of rulings just should not be able to happen.

Yet it has happened in Sweden.

A woman was convicted and sentenced for warning about a man that was convicted of sexual crimes against a 13 year old.

Meanwhile a man in his 40s who raped a 14 year old girl was set free by the court because the court claimed she could ”simply leave” during the attack.

I’m lost for words.

This is not the Sweden that I remember.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

What I’m about to tell you has barely been covered in the international news.

The things happening in Sweden now is beyond belief. I’m simply lost for words at this court ruling.

A man in his 40s was just set FREE by the court after raping a 14 year old girl in a park.

You read that correctly. It is shocking. And the reasoning in the verdict from the court is also shocking.

Let me give you all the details.

The man who is from Romania raped the 14 year old girl in a park in Stockholm. The girl is diagnosed with both autism and ADHD.

The girl said that the attack felt ”like an eternity”.

After what happened to her, she immediately called the police crying for help. It is being reported that the girl now has difficulties sleeping after what happened to her.

The man was prosecuted in Stockholm District Court, with the prosecutor asking for 3 years prison ande deportation from Sweden for life.

But what did the court rule?

Not only did the court not deport the man, but he didn’t even get any prison. He was set free.

And here comes some shocking details from the court verdict.

”The course of events appears, in the opinion of the district court, to be such that the plaintiff had several opportunities to simply leave and/or interrupt what was happening”.

Read that again.

Part of the reasoning that the court set this man free was because they claimed the 14 year old girl could ”simply leave” when she was being raped by the man in his 40s.

So the court essentially said that this young girl could have stopped the attack herself and therefore they set the an free.

Again, I’m lost for words. This is victim blaming.

One more important thing. The girl is a child. A child cannot consent. Yet the court set the man free. This just should not be possible. This kind of verdict should not be able to happen.

Now, I need to explain a little how the Swedish court works. In this case it was a lay judge verdict.

In Sweden there is a lay judge system. So in this case, there was 1 professional judge and 3 lay judges. Lay judges are people that are nominated by political parties. This is supposed to bring public representation into the court room.

But what happened here was that the 3 lay judges decided to set the man free. And guess what? One of the lay judges is affiliated with the centre-right Moderate party that is currently in government.

The professional judge however issued a dissenting opinion and wanted the man convicted and sentence to 3 years in prison and deportation from Sweden for life.

”In my opinion, the plaintiff’s account is supported by the emergency call and the incident report...one can also hear that the plaintiff is crying” the professional judge wrote.

So the professional judge wanted to convict the man, but the 3 politically appointed lay judges decided to set the man free.

The prosecutor is not happy with the verdict and is appealing to the Svea Court of Appeal.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

Here is something that you don’t hear much about in the news.

But right now something seems to be happening in Europe.

There has been an increasing public support for closing the borders and even deportations, something that has gained traction under the new term ”remigration”.

People have long been called ”far-right” for voicing such ideas. However, now polls show that in many European countries, there is now actually a large majority of the population that supports the idea of remigration.

Not only that, but it is now being pushed by major political parties such as the Austrian Freedom Party, which is by far the largest party in the latest polls.

I decided to take a look at the data and present it to you here.

Not long ago, I wrote about the new poll from Norway that found that there is now RECORD LOW support for more immigration into the country. Only 17% of Norwegians believe that Norway should take in more immigrants.

But not only that, the poll also found that 49% of people support voluntary returns and 35% of people support forced returns.

In total, 84% of people in Norway support remigration in some form if the situation in the home country is safe.

There was also a recent poll by Euromedia Research from Italy where they asked people their thoughts on this topic.

And it was found that 73% of Italians want to deport people who are in the country illegally.

Another recent poll from France conducted by the CSA Institute found similar numbers.

Here, they found that 83% of people in France support the idea of deporting people who have committed crime or are long term unemployed.

The most interesting thing in this poll perhaps, is that the strongest support for this was found among young people.

Among those 18 to 24 year old, a whopping 90% of people were in favor.

And this was not limited to left versus right. Support for deportation was high even among left-wing voters.

For those who support the Socialists, 75% of people were in favor of deportation.

Just recently, the EU Parliament votes to approve the new Return Regulation which gives member states the power to setup deportation centers, known as ”Return Hubs” in countries outside the EU.

So it seems like things are changing in Europe.

The idea of ”remigration” is becoming mainstream and something that many people now seemingly support.

And it is not a right or left issue. There is broad support across the political spectrum for this.

This is in stark contrast to the open borders we saw in Europe some ten years ago.

There is nothing extreme about wanting to protect your borders.

However, it is extreme to have completely open borders.

I’m bringing you the news that you don’t hear about in the mainstream media.

Support my independent journalism by upgrading to a paid subscriber today AND get access to exclusive articles!

Subscribe now

They have done it again.

The European Union have just come with more bureaucracy. It wasn’t enough with the plastic bottle caps.

Now a new law has come into effect on the 7th of July which requires all new cars in the EU to MONITOR the driver using cameras or similar sensors.

All cars must come installed with something called Advanced Driver Distraction Warning (ADDW for short).

So how exactly does this system work?

Well, all cars will come with a camera installed that constantly monitors the driver. Equivalent sensors are also allowed under this system, but it seems like cameras will be the standard.

These cameras will continuously be monitoring the eyes, face, head position and where the driver is looking.

It is designed to detect things like distraction or fatigue. This is being promoted as something that will be positive for safety.

And if the cameras deem that the driver looks away from the road for too long, for example if they spend too much time adjusting the temperature in the car.

This will then trigger warnings in the car, with lights on the dashboard and warning sounds. The cars must also give haptic feedback, such as vibrations in the steering wheel or in the seat itself.

Now, I know that many people will be concerned about having a camera inside the car that is constantly monitoring the driver.

But the cameras are not allowed to record videos, use facial recognition or send any data outside the car.

That is what is being said.

Sure, but how do we know it will stay this way?

Maybe the next step will be that facial recognition is added to the cameras. It will be very easy to implement once the hardware is in all the cars. Just a quick software update and suddenly the car can have facial recognition.

Perhaps it could be used in the future to ban anyone that the state dislikes from driving?

Perhaps a person had exceeded their carbon quota and now they are suddenly banned from driving for a month?

You never know what can happen in the future.

The more possibilities for surveillance, the easier it would be for a totalitarian system to take complete control.

Do you support freedom?

I do. The name of this publication is literally The Freedom Corner with PeterSweden.

Support my freedom publication by upgrading to a paid subscription today if you don’t have one already.

By doing so, you will be supporting my independent journalism and will allow me to do even more work to reach more people with news on freedom related topics and more.

And you get access to exclusive articles as well.

It’s a win win!

I try to keep as many of my articles as possible without a paywall, as I want as many people as possible reading about these important stories.

However, I can only do so if enough of my readers do support me with a paid subscription.

Your paid subscription is what allows me to write articles like this without a paywall!

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

The British government has announced a new draft bill called the ”Conversion Practices Bill”.

Of course, the government say that this bill is designed to protect people from ”abuse”.

But, I took a deeper look into the wording in this bill and it is quite frankly shocking.

The court can even issue a ”protection order” against a parent on a PREVENTATIVE BASIS if they think the parent is ”likely” to do something that violates this new bill. Read my article to the end to get the details on what this means.

Is this what is called pre crime?

Under this new bill, there is a serious concern that parents could be imprisoned (and more) if they for example tell their child that they are either male or female and certain criteria are met, which I will show you what they are.

Parents are risking up to 5 years in prison plus an UNLIMITED FINE if they are found to not follow this new law.

Because this new bill is broad, you just know that woke activists will use the new laws to persecute parents that refuse to follow the woke agenda.

In other words, parents that have traditional views on gender, that there is only male and female, and apply this to how they parent their children, will most certainly face risks under this new bill.

So, the bill aims to stop what they call abusive conversion practices.

What do they mean by this?

”conversion practice” means...any conduct carried out by a person towards an individual with the intention of

(a) causing the individual

(i) to have or not to have,

(ii) to believe that they have or do not have, a sexual orientation or a particular sexual orientation; or

(b) causing the individual

(i) to have or not to have,

(ii) to believe that they have or do not have, a transgender identity or a particular transgender identity.

And in another section of the bill they define transgender as also meaning that ”the individual identifies as neither male nor female or as not solely male or female”.

So the definition of transgender identity is broad and includes people who identify as non binary identities also. So, someone who identifies as ”genderfluid”, ”agender”, ”genderless” or ”bigender” would be covered by this new bill.

Keep that in mind as I go into more detail of what this bill says and how parents could be punished.

This new bill does not give exemptions to parents or family, meaning that anyone who is found in violation of this new law risk 5 years prison plus an unlimited fine. This includes parents, religious leaders and anyone else except medical professionals.

What kind of ”conduct” could cause a parent to be thrown in prison?

Let me tell you what the bill says. Let me give you a scenario.

• First: If a parent has shows conduct with the intention of either changing or preventing a belief in a particular gender identity, that qualifies as ”conversion practice” under the bill.

• Second: If a parent tells a child that they are either male or female or opposes the idea of ”genderfluid” for example and the parent use what the bill calls ”coercive words or behaviour”, then it would qualify as ”abusive conversion practice”.

• Third: If the parent has done what the bill calls ”abusive conversion practice” and it causes ”serious alarm or distress to the individual which has a substantial adverse effect on their usual day to day activities” it now crosses over into a CRIMINAL OFFENCE.

• Fourth: The parent can then be convicted in court and sentenced up to 5 years in prison plus an UNLIMITED FINE.

But it doesn’t stop there.

If anyone is found ”encouraging” a parent in ANOTHER country to tell their child that they are either male or female and it meets the criteria that I just listed above, they can also be thrown in prison for up to 5 years and unlimited fine.

For example, if someone posts it on social media, that could be enough to throw someone in prison.

But it doesn’t even stop there!

Authorities can also report or cause a ”Conversion Practice Protection Order” (CPPO) to be made against the parents if the court believes that the parents are ”likely to cause” ”serious alarm or distress to the individual which has a substantial adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal day to day activities”.

This can be done on a preventative risk basis without even what the bill calls a ”criminal offence” having been commited.

And what can this CPPO do?

Here is where things get even more Orwellian. Not only can the order be issued against a parent on a PREVENTATIVE BASIS, but the things the order can do is also very broad.

”A conversion practice protection order may contain

(a) such prohibitions, restrictions or requirements, and

(b) such other terms,

as the court considers appropriate for the purposes of the order.”

In other words, the court has a very broad discretion of what they can impose.

So for example, the court could order the parent to stop using certain words such as forcing the parent to stop telling their own child that they are either male or female.

The court could restrict or supervise contact. The court could also for example ban the parent from involving their child in religious activities that are deemed ”abusive”.

The court could possibly also order the parent to attend counselling. The list is pretty big because the court has very broad discretion.

And what happens if the parent doesn’t follow the CPPO? They can be thrown in prison for 2 years.

This is it.

Parents would risk being persecuted and thrown in prison by woke activists and authorities just because they want to raise their own children in a traditional way and they don’t agree with gender ideology.

It is clear that they think the children belong to the state rather than the parents.

And all this comes just shortly after Britain has RESTARTED trials where they will begin giving puberty blockers to children as young as 11.

I will say it loud and clear.

This goes against all human rights.

This is Orwellian.

Have you heard anything about this unbelievable story on the news?

I’m an independent journalist which is why I can bring you this story without any censorship.

But I need your help.

Please consider supporting my work with a paid subscription which will help to continue bringing you news stories like this – And I will be able to reach even more people.

Thank you for your support!

Subscribe now

Share

Just recently I reported on how the EU Parliament voted YES on the new Return Regulation.

This will enable countries to setup deportation centers, also called Return Hubs, in third countries located outside the EU.

And plans have already begun.

A group of EU countries have come together to coordinate efforts to create these return hubs with the goal of having them operational already by next year.

Denmark, Austria, Greece, Germany and the Netherlands are behind this push.

It is being mentioned that Rwanda and Uzbekistan are countries being considered where these return hubs will be built.

The government in Greece has previously said that return hubs like this will act as a deterrent to stop people from coming to Europe.

So the idea is that people arriving in Europe know there will be a chance they can be sent to a return hub far away from European borders. This in turn will act as a deterrent to stop people from coming in the first place.

And now this group of EU countries are in advanced stages of negotiations, already holding talks with host countries to build the return hubs there.

These return hubs will function essentially as deportation centers, places where people who have deportation order can be sent.

So if it is not possible to send them back to their home countries, they can be sent to these return hubs instead.

It appears that things are moving ahead quickly now.

Things are changing in Europe.

Subscribe now

Leave a comment