Praise the Lord. We cannot become lax or discouraged in this fight. Nations need their Sovereignty to protect the rights of laws AND freedoms. A right to worship whatever/whomever cannot declare their own laws, that everyone living there must abide or honor.
International Law (Pre-2020). Broadly known as the "Burqa Ban's. But applied to all facial coverings, including masks. Unobstructed faces deemed especially important in public settings, like public transportation. A Human Right!:
2014
"Judges at the European court of human rights (ECHR) have upheld France's burqa ban, accepting Paris's argument that it encouraged citizens to "live together".
The law, introduced in 2010, makes it illegal for anyone to cover their face in a public place...the law was not aimed at the burqa or veil but any covering of the face in a public place...
...The European judges decided...that the preservation of a certain idea of "living together" was the "legitimate aim" of the French authorities.
Isabelle Niedlispacher, representing the Belgian government, which introduced a similar ban in 2011 and which was party to the French defence, declared both the burqa and niqab "incompatible" with the rule of law.
Aside from questions of security and equality, she added: "It's about social communication, the right to interact with someone by looking them in the face and about not disappearing under a piece of clothing."
The French and Belgian laws were aimed at "helping everyone to integrate", Niedlispacher added."
2019 - Ruling just months before masks became mandatory.:
"On August 1, 2019, the “Act Partially Prohibiting Face-Covering Clothing,”also known as the “Burqa Ban,” entered into force in the Netherlands. The Act prohibits the wearing of clothing that completely or partially conceals the face in spaces where people are expected to communicate with each other. Thus, face-covering clothing is banned on public transportation and in educational, governmental, and nursing care institutions, but is still allowed in such public spaces as on train platforms. The ban applies to burqas, niqabs, full-face helmets, balaclavas, and masks, but not to headscarves."
The Courts were right pre-scamdemic. The Science (TM) of the scamdemic that mandated masking was wrong. Now they go back to what we all knew about masked faces: They are a violation of Human Rights! We have a RIGHT to see free faces. Scamdemic or not.
Several Euro countries are "finally" stepping up to the plate to ban face coverings in public spaces. How is a train station considered non-public? Waffling to make those countries that have their own rules (where they left from) and make them feel more comfortable in the foreign country they came to?Why did they leave in droves? One can only assume that
A. To get away from wherever for a better life, or
B. To take over.
IF the fines hold, then there may be a chance to "integrate" but it likely won't go that way due to how mostly all Euro countries welcomed them all in with shielded faces. No problems then, right?
While I understand why banning is ‘good’ news particularly in countries where this is not the norm I am also wondering if this is also just a way to make facial recognition and state surveillance of us all a lot easier too.
If the Right demanded full face coverings the left would be OUTRAGED against it! Honestly what does Not piss off the left? That’s a shorter list.
Praise the Lord. We cannot become lax or discouraged in this fight. Nations need their Sovereignty to protect the rights of laws AND freedoms. A right to worship whatever/whomever cannot declare their own laws, that everyone living there must abide or honor.
International Law (Pre-2020). Broadly known as the "Burqa Ban's. But applied to all facial coverings, including masks. Unobstructed faces deemed especially important in public settings, like public transportation. A Human Right!:
2014
"Judges at the European court of human rights (ECHR) have upheld France's burqa ban, accepting Paris's argument that it encouraged citizens to "live together".
The law, introduced in 2010, makes it illegal for anyone to cover their face in a public place...the law was not aimed at the burqa or veil but any covering of the face in a public place...
...The European judges decided...that the preservation of a certain idea of "living together" was the "legitimate aim" of the French authorities.
Isabelle Niedlispacher, representing the Belgian government, which introduced a similar ban in 2011 and which was party to the French defence, declared both the burqa and niqab "incompatible" with the rule of law.
Aside from questions of security and equality, she added: "It's about social communication, the right to interact with someone by looking them in the face and about not disappearing under a piece of clothing."
The French and Belgian laws were aimed at "helping everyone to integrate", Niedlispacher added."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/01/france-burqa-ban-upheld-human-rights-court
2019 - Ruling just months before masks became mandatory.:
"On August 1, 2019, the “Act Partially Prohibiting Face-Covering Clothing,”also known as the “Burqa Ban,” entered into force in the Netherlands. The Act prohibits the wearing of clothing that completely or partially conceals the face in spaces where people are expected to communicate with each other. Thus, face-covering clothing is banned on public transportation and in educational, governmental, and nursing care institutions, but is still allowed in such public spaces as on train platforms. The ban applies to burqas, niqabs, full-face helmets, balaclavas, and masks, but not to headscarves."
https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2019-08-27/netherlands-burqa-ban-enters-into-force/
The Courts were right pre-scamdemic. The Science (TM) of the scamdemic that mandated masking was wrong. Now they go back to what we all knew about masked faces: They are a violation of Human Rights! We have a RIGHT to see free faces. Scamdemic or not.
It's their country, let them do as it pleases them. Everybody should take care of their countries.
Several Euro countries are "finally" stepping up to the plate to ban face coverings in public spaces. How is a train station considered non-public? Waffling to make those countries that have their own rules (where they left from) and make them feel more comfortable in the foreign country they came to?Why did they leave in droves? One can only assume that
A. To get away from wherever for a better life, or
B. To take over.
IF the fines hold, then there may be a chance to "integrate" but it likely won't go that way due to how mostly all Euro countries welcomed them all in with shielded faces. No problems then, right?
While I understand why banning is ‘good’ news particularly in countries where this is not the norm I am also wondering if this is also just a way to make facial recognition and state surveillance of us all a lot easier too.
Excellent! It should happen everywhere. In fact, I think they should be considered abuse.