57 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Remy's avatar

a virus and a bioweapon are different things … biolabs study and design bioweapons under the pretext that they are working with viruses to protect us against future … pandemics. did you like the protection offered this time around? all that good work made a big difference didn’t it? suspended rights, discarded bodily autonomy … all in the name of public health. the right to take a novel gene manipulation product was the only “right” respected … imagine if Mike Yeadon was right and the covid virus is a total lie. people can also get sick from radiation exposure (who’s measuring that?), exposure to various chemicals in the air/water/food supply … want me to go on?

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

I agree, to a point.

Their excuse that they are doing GoF research for ‘public health’ reasons is BS.

They are doing it because they can, and want to. Public safety is the last thing they are worried about.

Bio labs are certainly creating biological weapons..... many based on viruses.

Chinese generals and government officials have openly discussed developing viruses to use against the US. They have even indicated a desire to develop an ethnogenic bioweapon, a virus which attacks people based on their race.

Billions have been spent on virus research worldwide.

They’ve been seen with electron microscopes, and below is a link to a site that shows the Covid 19 virus.

https://microbenotes.com/electron-microscopy-images-of-sars-cov-2/

I just find it almost impossible to believe that viruses don’t exist.

Expand full comment
Remy's avatar

your point about ethnogenic bioweapons is valid and a very real concern … it’s one of the drivers for the Russian invasion in Ukraine … all those biolabs were not just collecting dust, that’s for sure. US, China, Russia, Ukraine, Australia, Canada, Sweden are not the only countries doing this kind of research …

Expand full comment
Remy's avatar

i understand where you come from. i’ve also followed some of Lanka’s research and what virologists claim to be viruses Lanka believes to be spores. germ vs terrain theory have been around for longer than i’ve been alive and germ theory was widely adopted thanks to Pasteur’s work … what he showed was that if you boil the shit out of something (sterilize it) all suspected pathogens are eliminated so germs must be real. what terrain theory proposes is that viruses/other organisms are not innately pathogenic unless the environment conditions are encouraging it. that’s a big difference in the solution proposed! Germ theory proponents keep chasing vaccines/antibiotics/etc to neutralize all impending threats while terrain theory proposes creating a well balanced environment and strong natural immunity to overcome imbalances. one will always be attached to the pharma products while the other will only use them when absolutely necessary …

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

Also, for what it’s worth, viruses have been seen by electron microscopes since the late 1930’s.

For anyone who may be interested, below is a link to an article about the history of viruses:

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-biology2/chapter/history-of-viruses/

Expand full comment