Yeah yeah, the use of a word like ignorance to describe the character of someone with whom the user disagrees proves they have nothing substantive to offer. Which you did. not.
I stand by my idea. The surpluses generated by any economic system, any of the many isms, flow to the top regardless of the terminology. All you people are fighti…
Yeah yeah, the use of a word like ignorance to describe the character of someone with whom the user disagrees proves they have nothing substantive to offer. Which you did. not.
I stand by my idea. The surpluses generated by any economic system, any of the many isms, flow to the top regardless of the terminology. All you people are fighting over is control of the surpluses, and the 'little people' always and forever lose. At least until there are no surpluses left to fight over, which will be soon enough, as it always has in the past, this time its a global phenomenon.
Yeah yeah, the use of a word like ignorance to describe the character of someone with whom the user disagrees proves they have nothing substantive to offer. Which you did. not.
I stand by my idea. The surpluses generated by any economic system, any of the many isms, flow to the top regardless of the terminology. All you people are fighting over is control of the surpluses, and the 'little people' always and forever lose. At least until there are no surpluses left to fight over, which will be soon enough, as it always has in the past, this time its a global phenomenon.