yes, and that is a horrible form of government. We, and most of the rest of the world, have government ass backwards. What we SHOULD have is this: Local government should be at the top of the hierarchy. That is, when the locals make a decision about what can or cannot happen here in their own backyard, it should NOT be able to be overrul…
yes, and that is a horrible form of government. We, and most of the rest of the world, have government ass backwards. What we SHOULD have is this: Local government should be at the top of the hierarchy. That is, when the locals make a decision about what can or cannot happen here in their own backyard, it should NOT be able to be overruled by State or Federal bureaucrats. Likewise for decisions made at the State level, they should NOT be able to be overruled by the Feds. But we have it backwards: Feds can tell State AND Locals what they can and cannot do, and State can tell locals what they can and cannot do. When will we figure out that Local democracy is the only true democracy, and empire is a horrible form of government?
yes. I believe that's what the Founders intended: a confederation of independent states where the states have most of the power. Lincoln changed all that, so the states are now subservient to the feds.
But, I believe that's changing. For example, Louisiana senators just unanimously passed a law that states that no rule, regulation, mandate, tax or fee will be imposed on Louisianans by WEF, WHO or UN.
And what about all the states who have sent their National Guard units to support Texas in defending the border?
And Georgia legislature has passed a bill blocking hostile foreign nations from buying farmland in the state.
More and more, states are flexing their legislative muscles.
yes, and that is a horrible form of government. We, and most of the rest of the world, have government ass backwards. What we SHOULD have is this: Local government should be at the top of the hierarchy. That is, when the locals make a decision about what can or cannot happen here in their own backyard, it should NOT be able to be overruled by State or Federal bureaucrats. Likewise for decisions made at the State level, they should NOT be able to be overruled by the Feds. But we have it backwards: Feds can tell State AND Locals what they can and cannot do, and State can tell locals what they can and cannot do. When will we figure out that Local democracy is the only true democracy, and empire is a horrible form of government?
But you have to admire how Texas is saying "Scru u" to the feds and SCOTUS and abiding by the organic Constitution to protect its borders.
yes. I believe that's what the Founders intended: a confederation of independent states where the states have most of the power. Lincoln changed all that, so the states are now subservient to the feds.
But, I believe that's changing. For example, Louisiana senators just unanimously passed a law that states that no rule, regulation, mandate, tax or fee will be imposed on Louisianans by WEF, WHO or UN.
And what about all the states who have sent their National Guard units to support Texas in defending the border?
And Georgia legislature has passed a bill blocking hostile foreign nations from buying farmland in the state.
More and more, states are flexing their legislative muscles.