3 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Hilary Wallace's avatar

I don’t believe that J&J was less deadly - just far fewer people got it so numbers of death and injury were smaller. The similar technology of Astra Zeneca killed and maimed many. No, I believe that there’s something about the mRNA technology that was always intended to be the dominant one. Just look at the massive contracts that Moderna have signed with the U.K., Canadian and Australian Governments and the fact that all future ‘vaccines’ are I te Dee to follow the mRNA platform.

Expand full comment
NoHoHoBo's avatar

J&J is not an mRNA vaccine. It is an adenovirus vector technology and less likely to escape into the bloodstream. There were some clotting issues early on and the FDA shelved it just long enough for the Pfizer/Moderna crap to take the lead. Dr Ryan Cole said that the J&J shots clears out of the system faster.

Expand full comment
Markker's avatar

South Korea also!

Expand full comment