10 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Damien McKenna's avatar

"However, those who did get myocarditis from covid, which was a much lower number to begin with, did have more heart failure after 90 days than those who got it from the vaccine."

Just to be clear, does this part means that the people who got myocarditis from covid fared worse after 90 days than those who got it from the jabs?

Expand full comment
Peter Imanuelsen's avatar

Yes, that is what the study claims. That myocarditis after the vaccine was milder than the myocarditis after covid.

Expand full comment
Damien McKenna's avatar

Does it make clear whether the covid cohort previously had any shots?

Put another way, the question is which scenario happened:

1. Did not have shots, had Covid, developed myocarditis.

2. Had some shots, had Covid, developed myocarditis.

2. Was up to date on shots, had Covid, developed myocarditis.

This nuance gets hidden on a lot of related studies.

Expand full comment
Peter Imanuelsen's avatar

Nope, many of those who got myocarditis after covid were likely vaccinated. Likely a majority of them. They refuse to give the data on unvaccinated vs vaccinated. I wonder why that is...

Expand full comment
Joseph's avatar

Would a murderer out himself when he doesn't have to?

Expand full comment
Damien McKenna's avatar

At that point it would be prudent to look at figures for the percentages of people in each country that received the shots, including the percentages of how many people got different numbers of shots, and perform estimates against the myocarditis data. Most of Europe was very heavily vaccinated, so unless the numbers are from 2020 it's very likely that a large portion of the "Covid" cases had received at least two shots.

Expand full comment
Joseph's avatar

We can't even rely on the official jabbed numbers . They were inflated to intimidate the sceptics . My proof of that is that here in Australia they kept telling us that 95 % of the population had been jabbed . They told us this from about mid 2021 right through to the end of 2022 . The problem is that they kept telling/ begging people to get jabbed 24/7 , throughout that whole time period . If the 95% figure was accurate they wouldn't have needed to spend millions on radio , TV and papers to beg people to take the shot .

Expand full comment
Peter Imanuelsen's avatar

I think the jabbed numbers are probably mostly correct. Don't see anything that points to it being otherwise.

Expand full comment
Joseph's avatar

Any "official" study is 🐂💩 , so any claims resulting from it are to be taken with a pinch of salt.

Expand full comment
Joseph's avatar

Please keep in mind that there is no Covid . PCR that thing they stuck up peoples noses for two+ years is NOT a diagnostic test and that's according to its Nobel awarded inventor the late Kary Mullis. They were telling everyone worldwide they had Covid based on a "test" which is not diagnostic . That's how stupid this is. BTW , Kary Mullis who was a vehement outspoken critic of Dr FAUSTci supposedly died of pneumonia in August 2019 just before Event 201 and the outbreak of Stupid 19. If he were still alive this scam would never have got off the ground . How convenient .....for them.

Expand full comment