Thank you VERY much for the wonderful comment, and for fitting so much information in that not everyone might know of yet.
We DO, indeed, very much need to revisit the theory of virology.
If scientific methodology cannot be used to determine even if a postulated virus exists or not, never mind whether it's capable of infecting others wit…
Thank you VERY much for the wonderful comment, and for fitting so much information in that not everyone might know of yet.
We DO, indeed, very much need to revisit the theory of virology.
If scientific methodology cannot be used to determine even if a postulated virus exists or not, never mind whether it's capable of infecting others with the same symptoms, or not,
since it appears that no whole virus has ever been located in a sick person said to be teeming with whole viruses that they are thought to be spewing,
in order to isolate any such whole virus in order to test to determine the (replicable) postulated infectivity of that specific whole postulated virus,
because it appears that no whole virus has ever been located in a sick person said to be teeming with whole viruses that they are thought to be spewing at others,
so that, effectively, guesswork must be used, based on subjectively selecting 'likely-looking' fragments of genetic material within a jumbled biological soup, to (have a programmed computer) work out from the bits what that specific postulated whole virus *might* look like, never mind injecting a randomized biological soup into the gut, or brain, whatever, of some different species to see if its fur seems ruffled later, this purportedly being close enough to the symptoms of an inhaled respiratory (or whatever) illness
all because it appears that no whole virus has ever been located in a sick person said to be teeming with whole viruses that they are thought to be spewing at others...
I fail to see how this can be considered a branch of science... OR of medicine.
Yet I still find myself often 'speaking in germ theory' - which I once believed to be as solid as 'the law of gravity', thinking of this as more understandable to those not yet introduced to the issue...
WHO official tells us we must start now to increase surveillance, increase sequencing (no DNA privacy?) and increase the use of clinical care pathways
Which means everyone gets the same drug and nobody gets to choose. WHO gets a head start imposing its International Health Regulation amendments before they are voted on in May.
Meryl Nass
2 hr ago
....................
Leaving so little time, when the courts are so slow and so much of the population unaware of the hazard.
How to overcome a life-time of the indoctrination of so many of us, at the same time as explaining what is known of the COVID Con game?
How can so many lies fit in the same place, when there is and has never been any way to scientifically identify/test something that no-one can ever find - and when the COVID jabs use synthetic computer-coded 'genetic' material to genetically engineer into what becomes the human pathogen-producing 'factories' created by this process?
And how to show it - in court - in time to save humanity and whatever remains of unaltered natural Earth Life, all being under assault, as well?
Of course, that also would depend on finding non-corrupt Judges who still retain integrity/sanity/survival instincts... and civil forces who know their duty and are acting in the service of their country and people, rather than against them.
Thank you VERY much for the wonderful comment, and for fitting so much information in that not everyone might know of yet.
We DO, indeed, very much need to revisit the theory of virology.
If scientific methodology cannot be used to determine even if a postulated virus exists or not, never mind whether it's capable of infecting others with the same symptoms, or not,
since it appears that no whole virus has ever been located in a sick person said to be teeming with whole viruses that they are thought to be spewing,
in order to isolate any such whole virus in order to test to determine the (replicable) postulated infectivity of that specific whole postulated virus,
because it appears that no whole virus has ever been located in a sick person said to be teeming with whole viruses that they are thought to be spewing at others,
so that, effectively, guesswork must be used, based on subjectively selecting 'likely-looking' fragments of genetic material within a jumbled biological soup, to (have a programmed computer) work out from the bits what that specific postulated whole virus *might* look like, never mind injecting a randomized biological soup into the gut, or brain, whatever, of some different species to see if its fur seems ruffled later, this purportedly being close enough to the symptoms of an inhaled respiratory (or whatever) illness
all because it appears that no whole virus has ever been located in a sick person said to be teeming with whole viruses that they are thought to be spewing at others...
I fail to see how this can be considered a branch of science... OR of medicine.
Yet I still find myself often 'speaking in germ theory' - which I once believed to be as solid as 'the law of gravity', thinking of this as more understandable to those not yet introduced to the issue...
And now there's this:
Feb. 7 2023)
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/who-official-tells-us-we-must-start
WHO official tells us we must start now to increase surveillance, increase sequencing (no DNA privacy?) and increase the use of clinical care pathways
Which means everyone gets the same drug and nobody gets to choose. WHO gets a head start imposing its International Health Regulation amendments before they are voted on in May.
Meryl Nass
2 hr ago
....................
Leaving so little time, when the courts are so slow and so much of the population unaware of the hazard.
How to overcome a life-time of the indoctrination of so many of us, at the same time as explaining what is known of the COVID Con game?
How can so many lies fit in the same place, when there is and has never been any way to scientifically identify/test something that no-one can ever find - and when the COVID jabs use synthetic computer-coded 'genetic' material to genetically engineer into what becomes the human pathogen-producing 'factories' created by this process?
And how to show it - in court - in time to save humanity and whatever remains of unaltered natural Earth Life, all being under assault, as well?
Of course, that also would depend on finding non-corrupt Judges who still retain integrity/sanity/survival instincts... and civil forces who know their duty and are acting in the service of their country and people, rather than against them.
The last six lines sums up the problems we face although me gut feeling is that the majority have now woken up that something is terribly wrong .
Yeah, the perps've been that obvious about this not being about 'public health', thank goodness!