It would make sense. If it is the spike protein in the vaccine causing the menstrual disorders, then it would make sense if covid also could cause it since it also has the spike proteins.
It would make sense. If it is the spike protein in the vaccine causing the menstrual disorders, then it would make sense if covid also could cause it since it also has the spike proteins.
1. If there even is a novel virus circulating (& I have severe doubts about that, based on the fatal epidemiology being utterly inconsistent with this idea), in most people, the pathogen will not leave the airways. The battle for dominance is usually won by the immune system and pretty swiftly. So very few injected individuals would experience systemic virus & thus any chance of systemic spike protein (presumed to be the causative agent here, which might be incorrect).
2. By contrast, when injected with a gene expressing unregulated amounts of spike proteins in unsteered anatomical locations, by no means is the biooogical insult restricted to non-systemic compartments.
I conclude infection is very unlikely that an infected person would experience unwanted systemic effects. Certainly the younger & mostly immunocompetent ones.
Injected people however are in a macabre game of Russian roulette.
one the difference would be that the spike production is quite limited in a natural infection.
but after the jab you produce the spike protein for how long? I think they stopped testing after 2 months?
that is quite a difference in exposure. my menstrual irregularity lasted 2 cycles, to then go back to normal. how long do the vaccinated suffer? does it return to normal there too?
It would make sense. If it is the spike protein in the vaccine causing the menstrual disorders, then it would make sense if covid also could cause it since it also has the spike proteins.
Against that being a logical likelihood is this:
1. If there even is a novel virus circulating (& I have severe doubts about that, based on the fatal epidemiology being utterly inconsistent with this idea), in most people, the pathogen will not leave the airways. The battle for dominance is usually won by the immune system and pretty swiftly. So very few injected individuals would experience systemic virus & thus any chance of systemic spike protein (presumed to be the causative agent here, which might be incorrect).
2. By contrast, when injected with a gene expressing unregulated amounts of spike proteins in unsteered anatomical locations, by no means is the biooogical insult restricted to non-systemic compartments.
I conclude infection is very unlikely that an infected person would experience unwanted systemic effects. Certainly the younger & mostly immunocompetent ones.
Injected people however are in a macabre game of Russian roulette.
one the difference would be that the spike production is quite limited in a natural infection.
but after the jab you produce the spike protein for how long? I think they stopped testing after 2 months?
that is quite a difference in exposure. my menstrual irregularity lasted 2 cycles, to then go back to normal. how long do the vaccinated suffer? does it return to normal there too?
so many questions :)
I remember seeing that they discovered spike protein still in the body many months after vaccination, might be worth looking into more.