3 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Hilary Wallace's avatar

All this negative stuff coming out yet the US is still pushing it as hard as they can it seems.

I get very upset by this generalisation that if you’re over 65 you should still take it. I’m 67, had extremely mild covid (passed on to me by a vaccinated partner!), took Ivermectin (not sure if it would have been worse if I’d not had the Ivermectin). I never contemplated the vaccine and never will but somehow I’m in the ‘at risk’ category. I had milder covid than my vaccinated daughter and son-in-law in their earlier 30s. Cookie cutter medicine instead of looking at the individual. I trust my own GP who was firmly against the genetic shots but have no faith in the rest of them. Most medics have shown an appalling lack of due diligence in not doing any research for themselves and relying on captured regulatory bodies.

Expand full comment
RCJHgirl's avatar

I agree. It is almost as if they are trying to appease the authoritarian, globalist crowd by holding out “the elderly” when objecting to the injections. It’s like anyone over the age of 60 is in the throw away population. News flash: many if not most people in their 60’s (and beyond) consider themselves vigorous and in the prime of life. My experience is similar to yours. These experimental injections should not be pushed on anyone.

Expand full comment
MClark's avatar

Once we know the pathophysiology of the toxic jab - which has been known for a long time -- then statements about giving it to post 65 years sound like just kill the seniors to me. How dare they? Anyone from our supposed side who is mouthing that euthanasia and elder killing policy is a murderous callous reptile consciousness. Many elders died in the window of immediate first jab because of lowered immunity and because the shot is the spike killer. It was never measured because of data manipulation games - although I believe Berenson reported this early referencing a Scandinavian study (maybe Denmark) where they cared enough to get the data right. Elder immune systems are senescent and less liable to develop robust antibodies even in the framework of mainstream narrative bs. The actual FROM Covid deaths in seniors seem unclear because of the case rate data butchery which was absolutely intentional. At one point Tucker pointed out that FROM Covid deaths in seniors was occurring at an age that met or exceeded the average life expectancy age - in UK data that is better than US - I saw this discussion elsewhere too. Then Dr Yeadon points out the issues with expectations that the jab as it is has anything to do with protecting the nasal respiratory system from which it is disjoined basically -- well that realization he indicates make any rationale for jabs absurd. So how does giving elders an absurd and toxic killer spike work? Well it does what Remdesivir and midazolam protocols for euthanasia do. I expect to continue being a vibrant and wise aid to my family and community and nation for some time and the same lovable child of my Father in Heaven that I have always been. I AM made in His Image and for His pleasure. The Satanists and the careless cowards that would throw me away can burn 🔥

Expand full comment