With respect, that’s illogical, though I think you know that!
If the logic is that the elderly have poorly responsive immune systems which are slow to respond appropriately to a pathogen, I similarly argue they won’t benefit from a vaccination on precisely the same grounds.
The lack of efficacy of flu vaccines in the elderly supports thi…
With respect, that’s illogical, though I think you know that!
If the logic is that the elderly have poorly responsive immune systems which are slow to respond appropriately to a pathogen, I similarly argue they won’t benefit from a vaccination on precisely the same grounds.
The lack of efficacy of flu vaccines in the elderly supports this concern for illogical reasoning.
Instead, if there really was a pandemic, early treatments that don’t rely on ones immune system is the appropriate path to take.
This exchange underscores why vaccines, even if they were properly designed, tested & manufactured (& none of these three apply) would still be a stupid strategy, doomed to failure.
AS an A&E nurse in England of almost 30 years, I have only ever seen a handful of patients present conscious in ventricular tachycardia. Since this moderna bivalent junk has been administered, I have seen 10 people present with this arrythmia. 7 had a significant cardiac history. 4 did not revert to sinus rhythm with intravenous amiodarone and required electro cardioversion. It makes me wonder how many of these sudden deaths are pulseless ventricular tachycardia.
I would also wonder why so many of the elderly, and some not so elderly, have such compromised immune systems? Age is, of course, a factor, but many have been subjected to varying degrees of metabolic poisoning throughout their lives. Glyphosate, for example, is an insidious poison which (very slowly) destroys the cardiovascular system (goodbye glycocalyx) as well as destroying both vitamin D3 production and activation, as the wonderful Dr. Seneff has tried to warn us about for quite a while. She has also noted that those countries worst hit by covid were heavy glyphosate users. The phosphates in fertilisers also contribute, in that they contain 100+ times more ionising radiation (uranium) than natural soil. Not to mention the plethora of medications many are taking today; statins, beta-blockers, PPIs... The list is nearly endless, though often starts with an insane number of childhood vaccinations.
As far as (conventional) vaccines for non-respiratory conditions go, is not the basic idea solid? Introduce a somehow weakened version of the pathogen to the immune system and it will respond. I think that both urine therapy and homeopathy use this principle. The pharma produced vaccines are filled with extremely toxic substances; the idea being they will last longer (or maybe it is really that we will not). I know this is basic to you, and I have 1/1000000th the knowledge on this subject; but I wonder if you agree in principle?
With respect, that’s illogical, though I think you know that!
If the logic is that the elderly have poorly responsive immune systems which are slow to respond appropriately to a pathogen, I similarly argue they won’t benefit from a vaccination on precisely the same grounds.
The lack of efficacy of flu vaccines in the elderly supports this concern for illogical reasoning.
Instead, if there really was a pandemic, early treatments that don’t rely on ones immune system is the appropriate path to take.
This exchange underscores why vaccines, even if they were properly designed, tested & manufactured (& none of these three apply) would still be a stupid strategy, doomed to failure.
AS an A&E nurse in England of almost 30 years, I have only ever seen a handful of patients present conscious in ventricular tachycardia. Since this moderna bivalent junk has been administered, I have seen 10 people present with this arrythmia. 7 had a significant cardiac history. 4 did not revert to sinus rhythm with intravenous amiodarone and required electro cardioversion. It makes me wonder how many of these sudden deaths are pulseless ventricular tachycardia.
I would also wonder why so many of the elderly, and some not so elderly, have such compromised immune systems? Age is, of course, a factor, but many have been subjected to varying degrees of metabolic poisoning throughout their lives. Glyphosate, for example, is an insidious poison which (very slowly) destroys the cardiovascular system (goodbye glycocalyx) as well as destroying both vitamin D3 production and activation, as the wonderful Dr. Seneff has tried to warn us about for quite a while. She has also noted that those countries worst hit by covid were heavy glyphosate users. The phosphates in fertilisers also contribute, in that they contain 100+ times more ionising radiation (uranium) than natural soil. Not to mention the plethora of medications many are taking today; statins, beta-blockers, PPIs... The list is nearly endless, though often starts with an insane number of childhood vaccinations.
As far as (conventional) vaccines for non-respiratory conditions go, is not the basic idea solid? Introduce a somehow weakened version of the pathogen to the immune system and it will respond. I think that both urine therapy and homeopathy use this principle. The pharma produced vaccines are filled with extremely toxic substances; the idea being they will last longer (or maybe it is really that we will not). I know this is basic to you, and I have 1/1000000th the knowledge on this subject; but I wonder if you agree in principle?