"...who in the Biden administration and government is heavily invested in pharmaceutical stocks?"
All of them.
The state of emergency ends in May.
Right when the WHO is set to vote on the new pandemic treaty amendments, putting us at their whims as to when, where, who, and what we have to do when THEY declare we're in a plandemic. Alrea…
"...who in the Biden administration and government is heavily invested in pharmaceutical stocks?"
All of them.
The state of emergency ends in May.
Right when the WHO is set to vote on the new pandemic treaty amendments, putting us at their whims as to when, where, who, and what we have to do when THEY declare we're in a plandemic. Already at bat, H5N1. Their amendments are for vax on their demand, gulags for people that do not comply.
There is a silver lining. Biden won’t send that treaty to the Senate for ratification because it will not pass.
Without Senate ratification the WHO treaty or whatever it is not legally binding (even if it says otherwise in the text).
All Biden can do is promise that the US will adhere to the treaty during his time in office.
The next President can decide to flush it at any time.
Same goes with the Paris Climate accords. Trump pulled us out of that horror and Biden put the US back in.
The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, not the WHO or the UN or anything else, and the WHO doesn’t have an army to enforce their diktats.
Sorry, I do not trust our current senators to stand for the people or our Constitution. Many (most?) of them would gladly force vax the populace and put them in gulags.
They haven't stood for free speech and many want to take the 2nd amendment away, too.
The various Presidents have been doing this for a while now, maybe even before Clinton.
A democrat president will be elected and will want to commit the US to some international treaty or agreement (example: the World Court). They know that such an agreement or treaty will never meet the constitutional requirements to be passed (2/3 of senators are needed for passage.... a pretty high threshold) so they will issue an executive order saying that the United States Govt will adhere to the terms of the treaty/agreement during the term of that particular president. It’s as far as they can go without submitting the treaty/agreement to the Senate.
The next President can kill the previous executive order at his discretion.
And that is the silver lining. Some of this WHO crap may be implemented temporarily, but it isn’t necessarily permanent...... no matter what it says on paper.
And, most importantly, neither the UN nor the WHO have any power to enforce it in the US. It’s all up to the President and Senate....per the US Constitution.
"...who in the Biden administration and government is heavily invested in pharmaceutical stocks?"
All of them.
The state of emergency ends in May.
Right when the WHO is set to vote on the new pandemic treaty amendments, putting us at their whims as to when, where, who, and what we have to do when THEY declare we're in a plandemic. Already at bat, H5N1. Their amendments are for vax on their demand, gulags for people that do not comply.
There is a silver lining. Biden won’t send that treaty to the Senate for ratification because it will not pass.
Without Senate ratification the WHO treaty or whatever it is not legally binding (even if it says otherwise in the text).
All Biden can do is promise that the US will adhere to the treaty during his time in office.
The next President can decide to flush it at any time.
Same goes with the Paris Climate accords. Trump pulled us out of that horror and Biden put the US back in.
The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, not the WHO or the UN or anything else, and the WHO doesn’t have an army to enforce their diktats.
Sorry, I do not trust our current senators to stand for the people or our Constitution. Many (most?) of them would gladly force vax the populace and put them in gulags.
They haven't stood for free speech and many want to take the 2nd amendment away, too.
Gee, I hope you're right! That's encouraging news - and we don't get much of that!
The various Presidents have been doing this for a while now, maybe even before Clinton.
A democrat president will be elected and will want to commit the US to some international treaty or agreement (example: the World Court). They know that such an agreement or treaty will never meet the constitutional requirements to be passed (2/3 of senators are needed for passage.... a pretty high threshold) so they will issue an executive order saying that the United States Govt will adhere to the terms of the treaty/agreement during the term of that particular president. It’s as far as they can go without submitting the treaty/agreement to the Senate.
The next President can kill the previous executive order at his discretion.
And that is the silver lining. Some of this WHO crap may be implemented temporarily, but it isn’t necessarily permanent...... no matter what it says on paper.
And, most importantly, neither the UN nor the WHO have any power to enforce it in the US. It’s all up to the President and Senate....per the US Constitution.
A thank you to the Founding Fathers.....👏👏👏🫡