I believe the WHO has backed off because the main goal, approval of the gene therapy drug ( being marketed asca vaccine ) for kids so as to get it on the early childhood vaccinations list in most nations which then gives them immunity from harm from the drug thru the childhood vaccine schedule program since the existing immunity deals ap…
I believe the WHO has backed off because the main goal, approval of the gene therapy drug ( being marketed asca vaccine ) for kids so as to get it on the early childhood vaccinations list in most nations which then gives them immunity from harm from the drug thru the childhood vaccine schedule program since the existing immunity deals applies only to the emergency use Authoritarian version. Then I could be wrong and be misunderstanding how all this works
No, you’re not wrong. They get permanent indemnity once the “vaccine” becomes part of the childhood vaccine schedule. Parents need to refuse this for their children!
Constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes ( if the popular Barnes and Vivia youtube live podcasts) detailed this several times on the podcast pointing out that if Pfizer can get the drug onto the childhood vaccine schedule than any risks of liability on their part goes away. the current immunity works only for the emergency authorization use and so they can face risks unless it gets onto the childhood schedule. No doubt those bastards would also love to sell more of it but it's getting that permanent immunity that's the golden ticket
Barnes & Viva are phenomenal! Highly recommend their podcasts. Barnes’ knowledge of history, world politics and the law is amazing. Best watched on Rumble (under VivaFrei) or at Locals (VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com). You’ll be glad you checked them out!
I believe the WHO has backed off because the main goal, approval of the gene therapy drug ( being marketed asca vaccine ) for kids so as to get it on the early childhood vaccinations list in most nations which then gives them immunity from harm from the drug thru the childhood vaccine schedule program since the existing immunity deals applies only to the emergency use Authoritarian version. Then I could be wrong and be misunderstanding how all this works
I think the evidence is becoming overwhelming that children should not take the shots under any circumstance. They are trying to backpedal quietly.
Nailed it.
No, you’re not wrong. They get permanent indemnity once the “vaccine” becomes part of the childhood vaccine schedule. Parents need to refuse this for their children!
Constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes ( if the popular Barnes and Vivia youtube live podcasts) detailed this several times on the podcast pointing out that if Pfizer can get the drug onto the childhood vaccine schedule than any risks of liability on their part goes away. the current immunity works only for the emergency authorization use and so they can face risks unless it gets onto the childhood schedule. No doubt those bastards would also love to sell more of it but it's getting that permanent immunity that's the golden ticket
Barnes & Viva are phenomenal! Highly recommend their podcasts. Barnes’ knowledge of history, world politics and the law is amazing. Best watched on Rumble (under VivaFrei) or at Locals (VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com). You’ll be glad you checked them out!
I call him Robert "The Constitutional Pit Bull" Barnes.
Haha!