The attack on Waukesha received a similar lack of coverage.
Part of the reason may be mental health: if an attacker is truly unwell, the story actually shouldn't receive that much attention.
But your point is that if it were a "far-right" attacker it would be front page everywhere (even if that were a mistake from a mental health perspective). And the imbalance is a big problem.
The attack on Waukesha received a similar lack of coverage.
Part of the reason may be mental health: if an attacker is truly unwell, the story actually shouldn't receive that much attention.
But your point is that if it were a "far-right" attacker it would be front page everywhere (even if that were a mistake from a mental health perspective). And the imbalance is a big problem.
The attack on Waukesha received a similar lack of coverage.
Part of the reason may be mental health: if an attacker is truly unwell, the story actually shouldn't receive that much attention.
But your point is that if it were a "far-right" attacker it would be front page everywhere (even if that were a mistake from a mental health perspective). And the imbalance is a big problem.