12 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Rick Larson's avatar

Not in any way associated with communism, its fascism. Investors behind the scenes setting up a new business arrangement using government to force their plans.

The funny thing is these investors over the years are in the same vein that set up this agribusiness system they now seek to dismantle.

You vil eat zee bugs, unless of course, you know how to grow the food you eat.

Expand full comment
Peter Imanuelsen's avatar

Communism and fascism is basically the same thing.

Expand full comment
Rick Larson's avatar

In my view communism is a schism of fascism. The fascists use this imaginary utopia to further their (long range) plans.

Expand full comment
Peter Imanuelsen's avatar

The founder of Fascism, Mussolini was literally a Socialist. Same goes for the Germans, they were Socialists as well just like the Soviets and Communists...

Expand full comment
Rick Larson's avatar

Focus on the flow of money. When the flow stops you found a fascist.

Expand full comment
The Society of Problem Solvers's avatar

They are both centralized. Centralized power is always dangerous. Decentralized is the only way to protect against corruption. That is the problem. Our systems have been corrupted. We have solutions. Klaus Schwab is winning because he is defining the world he wants to see. We need to decentralize and do the same: https://joshketry.substack.com/p/klaus-schwab-is-right-we-need-to

Expand full comment
Rick Larson's avatar

There are no solutions to centralized systems, even those who know this work to keep the centralized system intact. Hierarchy always collapses from overuse of resources.

Schwab is a magician not a dictator. I think he only seeks to move the pile (a fascist collaborator).

Expand full comment
Brian Fleury's avatar

Perhaps they're basically the same thing in your mind, but in reality they are politically polar opposites. Speech that reveals ignorance adds nothing substantive to the conversation.

Expand full comment
Peter Imanuelsen's avatar

Both are tyrannical and authoritarian and Socialists. That's enough for me to conclude they are similar enough.

Expand full comment
Rick Larson's avatar

Yeah yeah, the use of a word like ignorance to describe the character of someone with whom the user disagrees proves they have nothing substantive to offer. Which you did. not.

I stand by my idea. The surpluses generated by any economic system, any of the many isms, flow to the top regardless of the terminology. All you people are fighting over is control of the surpluses, and the 'little people' always and forever lose. At least until there are no surpluses left to fight over, which will be soon enough, as it always has in the past, this time its a global phenomenon.

Expand full comment
The Society of Problem Solvers's avatar

Communism and Fascism share the same problem, they are both controlled by centralized and highly aligned entities and are easy to corrupt. Individualism is decentralized and thus the only safe way to combat this. Understanding these systems takes some effort. There is an amazing book on it listed here:

https://joshketry.substack.com/p/embrace-decentralized-systems-fear

Expand full comment
Rick Larson's avatar

There are no communists as there are no equally shared resources, its not possible. Communes are an imaginary mind construct of the fascists. I don't have to read a book to know the Bolsheviks were paid to kill off and enslave the independent peasants to the benefit of the surplus skimming fascists. You might even be receiving payments from this fascist system.

Expand full comment