No one is going to freeze at 19C that said this is being done as a stepping stone, incrimentalization. When the government is ready to enact tyranny it does it it small easily acceptable amounts to defeat resistance. Afetr all anyone unwilling to agree to a 19C limit during an energy crisis is being selfish. The issue is they will cont…
No one is going to freeze at 19C that said this is being done as a stepping stone, incrimentalization. When the government is ready to enact tyranny it does it it small easily acceptable amounts to defeat resistance. Afetr all anyone unwilling to agree to a 19C limit during an energy crisis is being selfish. The issue is they will continue to reduce this is small amounts until they can get it down low enough to do some serious damage to most people. It's easier to portray people as being selfish when they refuse to agree to heating restrictions when you do them in small increments because human beings are designed to adapt. The trick is to do it in just enough increments that it moves the needle without triggering to much resistance. At some point they will hit a floor where going any lower will trigger pushback. At that point the next phase of Authoritarian control will kick in.
In order for teh Authoritarian take over to work and persists they have to bring the majority of the publics along with them willingly. If not they risk revolution and until they have a fully controlled AI run military they can't defeat the masses thus the importance to get the majority to willingly go along with the changes. Who's to say what the next phase will be but I imagine it will have something to do with food or climate. They will use one or both to further justify additional restrictions and they will keep doing this until they have culled the population to a more easily managed number and once the technological advancements allow for the creation and use of AI controlled humanoid like robots that can perform the duties of law enforcement and the military. Once at that point there will no longer be any need to appeal to to the masses.
True and I did not debate or question that the no heat for 6 hours things is bad. My focus is on the 19c cap because that's where all dialogue in the news media about this will take place. One of 2 things is either going to happen, either the No heat for 6 hours was included as a false flag compromise or all debate/discussion about the policy will be focused solely around the 19c cap.
RED HERRING: The no heat for 6 hours nightly thing may have been added with the purpose of being removed later so as to make the 19c cap seem like a reasonable compromise. It is after all a very drastic step to take and if energy supplies were truly bad enough to warrant it then you’d think there’d be more restrictions in place that are throughout the day. Something about the 6 hours of no heat just doesn’t square up. I believe after enough pushback/debate and maybe even some actual deaths because of it they will change the policy, removing the no heat at all and either make the 19c cap longer or possibly even reduce it to say 18c.
NOT A RED HERRING: If the no heat for 6 hours is not there so as to be removed later then you can bet all dialogue/debate around the policy change will be limited to the 19c cap. No one will be allowed to discuss the no heat for 6 hours thing. Some talk will leak thru such as live conversations with non-corrupt politicians but the vast majority will be focused solely around the cap which by itself does not sound unreasonable during an energy crisis.
Which ever one it is you have to work within what they will allow and in both scenarios its discussion of whether or not a 19c (or lower) cap is reasonable or not and few are going to say it’s not reasonable because as humans we don’t want to be isolated as that guy who refused to make a reasonable compromise that others were wiling to make and you will be made out to be the selfish person who refused to make a small sacrifice. They used this same tactic with great effect on masking and vaccine acceptance. As humans we quickly adapt so once they get enough public buy-in to the 19c cap it’s only a matter of time before they start to reduce it in small reasonable sounding increments. If the end goal is to get us down to say 10c they aren’t going to go from 19c to 10c in one go, they will do it in 1 degree increments over time. Incrimentalization is a highly effective tactic for those in power to change society.
It all about psychology and you have to play that game. If the no heat thing is not a red herring they are not going allow any debate about, not in the media/news. Instead we have to point out how the 19c cap is about getting that initial limitation and how like with all tings the government does, it they will expand it over time in small increments.
that’s why people should be focused instead on making the policy makers adhere to the same rules :) this is all that’s needed, although it will take a lot of time and effort, with the drastic measure of simply destroying the infrastructure that leads to their homes and offices to prevent them from ever using it. it can be done remotely, no need to actually get inside… just make it unusable.
it won’t even take many people to achieve, but I’d really like to hear how a member of the general public will defend the right of those who make their kids and elders suffer, to keep their priviledges :) I bet, people will cheer…
You can destroy society without destroying your own home or even business. They've been doing tis already for years, decades even; it's called a controlled demolition. Public leaders will claim they are gong thru the same pain and suffering but they are professional liars and since they are in control they will keep things opaque so we the peasants are not aware of what is really happening.
I never said the part about no heart usage between 23:00 and 5:500 would knot be another separate issue only that the way they are presenting it is to do it incrementally in order to make it palpable to the majority. What will most likely happen iis they will back down from the NO HEAT between 23:00 and 5:00 hours as a "compromise" and claim they are trying to be reasonable. At that point it will be hard to argue that they are not being reasonable as 19C isn't an unreasonable heat level by any means. Remember they are engaged in psychological warfare, they have to get the majority to go along with their plans so it must always be semi-reasonable. Where things go awry is when the masses continue to compromise until they've compromised themselves into a loosing position. The only TRUE plan is to NEVER compromise because once you do its only a matter of time before you have compromised yourself into defeat.
No one is going to freeze at 19C that said this is being done as a stepping stone, incrimentalization. When the government is ready to enact tyranny it does it it small easily acceptable amounts to defeat resistance. Afetr all anyone unwilling to agree to a 19C limit during an energy crisis is being selfish. The issue is they will continue to reduce this is small amounts until they can get it down low enough to do some serious damage to most people. It's easier to portray people as being selfish when they refuse to agree to heating restrictions when you do them in small increments because human beings are designed to adapt. The trick is to do it in just enough increments that it moves the needle without triggering to much resistance. At some point they will hit a floor where going any lower will trigger pushback. At that point the next phase of Authoritarian control will kick in.
In order for teh Authoritarian take over to work and persists they have to bring the majority of the publics along with them willingly. If not they risk revolution and until they have a fully controlled AI run military they can't defeat the masses thus the importance to get the majority to willingly go along with the changes. Who's to say what the next phase will be but I imagine it will have something to do with food or climate. They will use one or both to further justify additional restrictions and they will keep doing this until they have culled the population to a more easily managed number and once the technological advancements allow for the creation and use of AI controlled humanoid like robots that can perform the duties of law enforcement and the military. Once at that point there will no longer be any need to appeal to to the masses.
Actually all heating is banned at night between 11pm and 5am, so people will freeze. Especially in north Italy where it can get cold in the winter.
True and I did not debate or question that the no heat for 6 hours things is bad. My focus is on the 19c cap because that's where all dialogue in the news media about this will take place. One of 2 things is either going to happen, either the No heat for 6 hours was included as a false flag compromise or all debate/discussion about the policy will be focused solely around the 19c cap.
RED HERRING: The no heat for 6 hours nightly thing may have been added with the purpose of being removed later so as to make the 19c cap seem like a reasonable compromise. It is after all a very drastic step to take and if energy supplies were truly bad enough to warrant it then you’d think there’d be more restrictions in place that are throughout the day. Something about the 6 hours of no heat just doesn’t square up. I believe after enough pushback/debate and maybe even some actual deaths because of it they will change the policy, removing the no heat at all and either make the 19c cap longer or possibly even reduce it to say 18c.
NOT A RED HERRING: If the no heat for 6 hours is not there so as to be removed later then you can bet all dialogue/debate around the policy change will be limited to the 19c cap. No one will be allowed to discuss the no heat for 6 hours thing. Some talk will leak thru such as live conversations with non-corrupt politicians but the vast majority will be focused solely around the cap which by itself does not sound unreasonable during an energy crisis.
Which ever one it is you have to work within what they will allow and in both scenarios its discussion of whether or not a 19c (or lower) cap is reasonable or not and few are going to say it’s not reasonable because as humans we don’t want to be isolated as that guy who refused to make a reasonable compromise that others were wiling to make and you will be made out to be the selfish person who refused to make a small sacrifice. They used this same tactic with great effect on masking and vaccine acceptance. As humans we quickly adapt so once they get enough public buy-in to the 19c cap it’s only a matter of time before they start to reduce it in small reasonable sounding increments. If the end goal is to get us down to say 10c they aren’t going to go from 19c to 10c in one go, they will do it in 1 degree increments over time. Incrimentalization is a highly effective tactic for those in power to change society.
It all about psychology and you have to play that game. If the no heat thing is not a red herring they are not going allow any debate about, not in the media/news. Instead we have to point out how the 19c cap is about getting that initial limitation and how like with all tings the government does, it they will expand it over time in small increments.
that’s why people should be focused instead on making the policy makers adhere to the same rules :) this is all that’s needed, although it will take a lot of time and effort, with the drastic measure of simply destroying the infrastructure that leads to their homes and offices to prevent them from ever using it. it can be done remotely, no need to actually get inside… just make it unusable.
it won’t even take many people to achieve, but I’d really like to hear how a member of the general public will defend the right of those who make their kids and elders suffer, to keep their priviledges :) I bet, people will cheer…
You can destroy society without destroying your own home or even business. They've been doing tis already for years, decades even; it's called a controlled demolition. Public leaders will claim they are gong thru the same pain and suffering but they are professional liars and since they are in control they will keep things opaque so we the peasants are not aware of what is really happening.
I never said the part about no heart usage between 23:00 and 5:500 would knot be another separate issue only that the way they are presenting it is to do it incrementally in order to make it palpable to the majority. What will most likely happen iis they will back down from the NO HEAT between 23:00 and 5:00 hours as a "compromise" and claim they are trying to be reasonable. At that point it will be hard to argue that they are not being reasonable as 19C isn't an unreasonable heat level by any means. Remember they are engaged in psychological warfare, they have to get the majority to go along with their plans so it must always be semi-reasonable. Where things go awry is when the masses continue to compromise until they've compromised themselves into a loosing position. The only TRUE plan is to NEVER compromise because once you do its only a matter of time before you have compromised yourself into defeat.
ABSOLUTLEY,,,,,DO NOT COMPLY AT ALL.....PROTEST AND REMOVE THESE PEOPLE FROM POWER NOW